Smt. Jagdeep M.Shukla, Vadodara V. Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle-1(2), Vadodara

ITA 916/AHD/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 125 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 2662 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 4 month(s) 10 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 21-08-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: Not Allotted
• Assessment Year: 2012-2013
• Appeal Filed On: 11-04-2016
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: LALIT P JAIN
• Keywords: Reasonable cause
• Section: 143(3)

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD C BENCH BEFORE: SHR I MAHAVIR PRASAD , JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JAGDEEP M. SHUKLA, 7, HARMONY RESIDENCY, NEAR SPRING EXOTICA, B/H PANCHMUKHI HANUMANJI TEMPLE, VASNA BHAILI ROAD VADODARA - 390023 PAN: APCPS3250B (APPELLANT) VS THE D CIT, CIRCLE - 1 (2) , BARODA (RESPONDENT) REVENU E BY : S H RI LALIT P. JAIN , SR. D . R. ASSESSEE BY: NONE DATE OF HEARING : 20 - 08 - 2 018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 21 - 08 - 2 018 / ORDER P ER : AMARJIT SINGH, ACC OUNTANT MEMBER : - THIS ASSESSEE S APPEAL FOR A.Y. 2008 - 09 , ARI SES FROM ORDER OF THE CIT(A) - 5, VADODARA DATED 31 - 1 2 - 2 015 , IN PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTION 143(3) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961; IN SHORT THE ACT . 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, NONE APPEARED ON B EHALF OF THE APPELLANT - ASSESSEE. LAST NOTICE DATED 20/02/2018 OF HEARING WAS SE NT TO THE ASSESSEE FIXING THE DATE OF HEARING ON 20/08/2018 AT THE ADDRESS INDICATED IN COLUMN NO. 10. DESPITE THIS, THE ASSE SSEE REMAINED UNREPRESENTED. IN THE AFOREMENTION ED I T A NO . 916 / A HD/20 16 A SS ESSMENT YEAR 2012 - 13 I.T.A NO. 916 /AHD/20 16 A.Y. 2012 - 13 PAGE NO SMT. JAGDEEP M. SHUKLA VS. D CIT 2 PECULIAR FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY REPRESENTATION ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE OR PETITION SEEKING TIME, IT CAN BE SAFELY PRESUMED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT SERIOUS IN PURSUING THE APPEAL FILED. ACCORDINGLY THE ONLY ALTERNAT IVE LEFT IS TO DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE. SUPPORT IS DRAWN FROM THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNALS IN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS. MULTI PLAN INDIA (P) LTD.; 38 ITD 320 (DEL) AND ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKA VS. CWT: 223 ITR480 (M.P.). 3. BEFORE PARTING, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO ADD THAT IN CASE THE ASSESSEE IS ABLE TO SHOW THAT THERE WAS A REASONABLE CAUSE FOR NON - REPRESENTATION ON THE DATE OF HEARING, IT WOULD BE AT LIBERTY IF SO ADVISED TO PRAY FOR A RECALL OF THIS ORDER. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPE AL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PR ONOUNCED IN THE OPEN C OURT ON 21 - 08 - 201 8 SD/ - SD/ - ( MAHAVIR PRASAD ) ( AMARJIT SINGH ) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD : DATED 21 /08 /2018 / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO: - 1. ASSESSEE 2. REVENUE 3. CONCERNED CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. GUARD FILE. BY ORDER/ , / ,