Smt. Vimla Devi Rajawat C/o- M/s. Baradia & Company, CA B-15A, Chomu House behind Natural Ice Cream Parlour C-Scheme Jaipur, Jaipur V. ITO Ward-5(5), Jaipur, Jaipur

ITA 922/JPR/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 109 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 4616 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 7 month(s) 8 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 10-02-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2013-2014
• Appeal Filed On: 02-07-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,B JAIPUR JH LAANHI XKSLKBZ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA - @ ITA NO. 922/JP/2019 FU/KZKJ.K O'KZ @ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2013-14 VIMLA DEVI RAJAWAT 496, MUNSIRAMJI DAS KA RASTA, GANGAPOLE, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. I.T.O., WARD-5(5), JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA -@THVKBZVKJ LA -@ PAN/GIR NO. ADQPR0390H VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ L S@ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI MUKESH KHANDELWAL (C.A.) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SMT. MONISHA CHOUDHARY (ADDL.CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING : 09/02/2021 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 10/02/2021 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. THE PRESENT APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIT(A)-2, JAIPUR DATED 25.04.2019 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-14. 2. HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS CONCLUDED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE IN VIEW OF THE PREVAILING SITUATION OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC. 3. THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE FURNISHED APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THIS APPEAL. THE CONTENTION MADE IN THE SAID APPLICATION READS AS UNDER:- ITA NO. 922/JP/2019 SMT. VIMLA DEVI RAJAWAT VS. ITO 2 IN VIEW OF RECEIPT OF FROM NO. 3 UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020, ISSUED BY THE HONBLE CIT (ADMN)-2, JAIPUR VIDE ACKNOWLEDGMENT NO. 794243870081220 THE APPELLANT WISHES TO WITHDRAW HER CAPTIONED APPEAL IN VIEW OF PROVISIONS OF SAID ACT. YOU ARE KINDLY REQUESTED TO ALLOW THE APPELLANT TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL AND OBLIGE. THANKING YOU YOURS FAITHFULLY, (VIMLA DEVI RAJAWAT) APPELLANT 4. THE LD. DR HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. 5. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY APPROACHED THE DEPARTMENT TO SETTLE THE MATTER UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, WE PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW THIS APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 6. IN THE RESULT, THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 10/02/2021. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO LANHI XKSLKBZ (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 10/02/2021. ITA NO. 922/JP/2019 SMT. VIMLA DEVI RAJAWAT VS. ITO 3 *RANJAN VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- SMT. VIMLA DEVI RAJAWAT, JAIPUR. 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- ITO, WARD-5(5), JAIPUR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR. 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE {ITA NO. 922/JP/2019} VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASST. REGISTRAR