VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHE S,B JAIPUR JH LAANHI XKSLKBZ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SING H YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA- @ ITA NO. 932/JP/2017 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z @ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2008-09 SHRI VIRENDRA KUMAR AGARWAL 15, SHREE VIHAR COLONY, JLN MARG, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. THE ITO, WARD-7(3), JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO. ACOPA 5824 E VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ L S@ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI DEVANG GARGIEYA (ADV.) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SMT. MONISH CHOUDHARY (ACIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING : 02/02/2021 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 03/02/2021 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. THE PRESENT APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIT(A)-III, JAIPUR DATED 19.09.2017 FOR TH E ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09. 2. HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS CONCLUDED THROUGH VIDE O CONFERENCE IN VIEW OF THE PREVAILING SITUATION OF COVID-19 PANDEM IC. ITA NO. 932/JP/2017 SHRI VIRENDRA KUMAR AGARWAL VS. ITO 2 3. THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE FURNISHED APPLI CATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THIS APPEAL. THE CONTENTION IN THE SA ID APPLICATION READS AS UNDER:- HONBLE SIR, IN THIS CONNECTION, IT IS SUBMITTED THAT AS INSTRUC TED BY THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CLIENT, IT IS HEREBY PRAYED THAT THE ABOV E APPEAL PLEASE BE TREATED AS WITHDRAW WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT IN AS MUCH AS THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED FOR SETTLEMENT UNDER THE VIVAD S E VISHWAS SCHEME-2020. A FORMAL ORDER, TO THIS EFFECT MAY KIN DLY BE PASSED AT AN EARLY DATE AND OBLIGE. THANKING YOU. YOURS FAITHFULLY, FOR MAHENDRA GARIEYA & ASSOCIATES. 4. THE LD. DR HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. 5. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY APPROACHED THE DEPARTMENT TO SETTLE THE MATTER UNDE R VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, WE PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW THIS APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSE D AS WITHDRAWN. 6. IN THE RESULT, THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DI SMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ITA NO. 932/JP/2017 SHRI VIRENDRA KUMAR AGARWAL VS. ITO 3 ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 03/02/2021. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO LANHI XKSLKBZ (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 03/02/2021. * SANTOSH. VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- SHRI VIRENDRA KUMAR AGARWAL, JAIPUR. 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- ITO, WARD-7(3), JAIPUR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR. 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE {ITA NO. 932/JP/2017} VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASST. REGISTRAR