IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH A: NEW DELHI (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NOS.9383 TO 9385/DEL/2016 ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2011-12 TO 2013-14 M/S TECNOVA INDIA PVT. LTD. 573, 3 FLOOR, MAIN ROAD, CHIRAG DELHI, NEW DELHI-110017 PAN : AAACT0831H VS. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-16(1), C.R. BUILDING, NEW DELHI-110002 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SH. M. BARANWAL, SR. DR DATE OF HEARING : 20.01.2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 20.01.2021 ORDER PER G.S. PANNU, VP : THESE APPEALS BY THE ASSESSEE FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 2011-12 TO 2013-14 ARE DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDERS OF LEARNED CIT(A)-43, NEW DELHI, DATED 17.09.2019 AND 30.09.2019 RESPECTIVELY. 2. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE DURING THE COURSE OF VIRTU AL HEARING BEFORE US. THE ASSESSEE, VIDE ITS LETTER DATED 14.01.20 21, RECEIVED ITA-9383 TO 9385/DEL/2019 2 THROUGH EMAIL, HAS REQUESTED FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEALS FILED BY HIM AND STATED THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE RELATIN G TO THE TAX ARREARS FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS UNDER CONSIDERATION UNDER THE V IVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020. A CERTIFICATE TO THIS EFFECT UNDER SECTIO N 5(1) OF THE DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020 HAS ALSO BEEN FILED. 3. LEARNED SENIOR DR HAS NO OBJECTION. 4. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, WE ACCEPT THE REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEE FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEALS. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED AS WIT HDRAWN. ABOVE DECISION WAS ANNOUNCED ON CONCLUSION OF VIRTUAL HEARING ON 20 JANUARY, 2021. SD/- SD/- (SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA) (G.S. PANNU) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT F{X~{T COPY FORWARDED TO: - 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, ITAT, DELHI