M/s. Sairung Developers & Promoters Pvt.Ltd, Pune V. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle - 6, Pune

ITA 94/PUN/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 106 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6031 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 year(s) 6 month(s) 7 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 17-07-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2012-2013
• Appeal Filed On: 10-01-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Section: 143(3)

Judgement Text

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण “बी” Ɋायपीठ पुणेमŐ। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, PUNE BEFORE SHRI S.S.GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं. / ITA No.94/PUN/2019 िनधाᭅरणवषᭅ / Assessment Year : 2012-13 M/s.Sairung Developers & Promoters Pvt. Ltd., Hinjewadi IT Phase 2, Opp.Bharat Petrol Pump, Behind ICICI Bank, Hinjewadi, Pune – 411057. PAN;/ AACCS 9538 G Vs The DCIT, Circle-6, Pune. Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee by Shri Hari Krishna – AR Revenue by Shri Rajarshi Dwivedy – DR Date of hearing 05/07/2022 Date of pronouncement 18/07/2022 आदेश/ ORDER PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM: This appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against the order of ld.Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-4, Pune which is against an order under section 143(3) of the Act, 1961, for the A.Y. 2012-13 dated 27.10.2017. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: “1. The Ld. CIT-A erred in confirming the addition of Rs.15,00,000/- on account of travelling expenses. 2. The Ld. CIT-A erred in confirming the addition of Rs.72,567/- on account of unexplained claim of Wealth Tax.” 2. At the outset of hearing before this Bench, Shri Hari Krishan, AR of the assessee present for the assessee submitted that the appellant company do not want to press the grounds of appeal, hence, the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn. ITA No.94/PUN/2018 for A.Y. 2012-13 M/s.Sairung Developers & Promoters Pvt. Ltd., Vs. DCIT [A] 2 3. On the other hand the learned Departmental Representative (DR) submits that he has no objection, if the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee stands dismissed as ‘withdrawn’. Order pronounced in the open Court on 18 th July, 2022. Sd/- Sd/- (S.S.GODARA) (DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / Pune; ᳰदनांक / Dated : 18 th July, 2022/ SGR* आदेशकᳱᮧितिलिपअᮕेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथᱮ / The Appellant. 2. ᮧ᭜यथᱮ / The Respondent. 3. The CIT(A), concerned. 4. The Pr. CIT, concerned. 5. िवभागीयᮧितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “बी” बᱶच, पुणे / DR, ITAT, “B” Bench, Pune. 6. गाडᭅफ़ाइल / Guard File. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER, // TRUE COPY // Senior Private Secretary आयकरअपीलीयअिधकरण, पुणे/ITAT, Pune.