VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHE S,A JAIPUR JH LAANHI XKSLKBZ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SING H YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA- @ ITA NO. 941/JP/2017 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z @ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2013-14 M/S RAMAVTAR KRISHANAVTAR B-29, BHAMASHAH MANDI, KOTA. CUKE VS. THE ITO, WARD-1(3), KOTA. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO. AADFR 1857 P VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPOND ENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ L S@ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI SAURAV HARSH (ADV.) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SMT. MONISHA CHOUDHARY (JCIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING : 23/06/2021 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 23/06/2021 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. THE PRESENT APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIT(A), KOTA DATED 05.09.2017 FOR THE ASSE SSMENT YEAR 2013- 14. 2. HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS CONCLUDED THROUGH VIDE O CONFERENCE IN VIEW OF THE PREVAILING SITUATION OF COVID-19 PANDEM IC. ITA NO. 941/JP/2017 M/S RAMAVTAR KRISHANAVTAR VS. ITO 2 3. THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE FURNISHED APPLI CATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THIS APPEAL. THE CONTENTION IN THE SA ID APPLICATION READS AS UNDER:- HONBLE SIR, THE ABOVE NOTED APPEAL IS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 23.0 6.2021. THAT ASSESSEE HAS OPTED FOR THE SCHEME VIVAD SE VI SHWAS INTRODUCED BY THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT DURING UNION B UDGET 2020. THAT AS PER THE SCHEME THE ASSESSEE APPELLANT HAS V OLUNTARILY WAIVED ALL HIS RIGHTS, WHETHER DIRECT OR INDIRECT, TO SEEK OR PURSUE ANY REMEDY OR ANY CLAIM IN RELATION TO THE TAX-ARRE AR WHICH MAY OTHERWISE BE AVAILABLE TO HIM UNDER ANY LAW FOR THE TIME BEING IN FORCE. (COPY OF FORM 3 IS ENCLOSED HEREWITH) THAT ACCORDINGLY THE ASSESSEE APPELLANT DOES NOT WI SH TO PURSUE THE INSTANT INCOME TAX APPEAL PENDING BEFORE THE HO N'BLE ITAT, JAIPUR BENCH AND THE PENDING APPEAL IS ACCORDINGLY BEING PRAYED TO BE PERMITTED TO BE WITHDRAWN. IT IS THEREFORE MOST HUMBLY REQUESTED THIS APPLICAT ION BE ALLOWED AND THE INCOME TAX APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE APP ELLANT BE ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN; THANKING YOU. YOURS FAITHFULLY, FOR RAMAVTAR KRISHANAVTAR 4. THE LD. DR HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. ITA NO. 941/JP/2017 M/S RAMAVTAR KRISHANAVTAR VS. ITO 3 5. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY APPROACHED THE DEPARTMENT TO SETTLE THE MATTER UNDE R VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, WE PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW THIS APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSE D AS WITHDRAWN. 6. IN THE RESULT, THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DI SMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 23/06/2021. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO LANHI XKSLKBZ (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 23/06/2021. * SANTOSH. VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- M/S RAMAVTAR KRISHANAVTAR, KOTA. 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- ITO, WARD-1(3), KOTA. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR. 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE {ITA NO. 941/JP/2017} VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASST. REGISTRAR