DY CAO (TA) Western Railway Traffic Accounts Office, Mall Road, DRM Office, Ajmer, Ajmer V. DCIT, CPC (TDS) Ghajiabad, Ghajiabad

ITA 944/JPR/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 109 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1574 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 7 month(s) 6 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 15-02-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2018-2019
• Appeal Filed On: 09-07-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: ANKUR SALGIA
• Keywords: TDS

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,B JAIPUR JH LAANHI XKSLKBZ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA - @ ITA NO. 943 & 944/JP/2019 FU/KZKJ.K O'KZ @ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2018-19 (24Q & 26Q , 1ST QTR.) DY CAO (TA), WESTERN RAILWAY, TRAFFIC ACCOUNTS OFFICE, MALL ROAD, DRM OFFICE, AJMER. CUKE VS. THE DCIT, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD. TAN NO. JDHT01559F VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ L S@ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI ANKUR SALGIA (C.A.) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SMT. MONISHA CHOUDHARY (ADDL.CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING : 10/02/2021 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 15/02/2021 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. THE PRESENT APPEALS HAVE BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIT(A), AJMER BOTH DATED 30.04.2019 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2018-19 (24Q & 26Q, 1 ST QTR.). 2. HEARING OF THE APPEALS WAS CONCLUDED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE IN VIEW OF THE PREVAILING SITUATION OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC. 3. THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE FURNISHED APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THESE APPEALS. THE CONTENTION MADE IN ONE OF THE SAID APPLICATION READS AS UNDER:- ITA NO. 943 & 944/JP/2019 DY CAO (TA), WESTERN RAILWAY VS. DCIT 2 RESPECTED SIR, WITH REFERENCE TO THE ABOVE-MENTIONED APPEAL WE WOULD LIKE TO BRING TO YOUR NOTICE WE HAD FILED VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME AND FORM 3 HAS BEEN RECEIVED FROM THE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT. AS PER SCHEME WE HAVE TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL, SO WE WANT TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL. KINDLY ACCEPT OUR APPLICATION. THANKING YOU YOURS SINCERELY, SR. A.F.A (T.A.), TAO, W.RLY., AJMER. 4. THE LD. DR HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. 5. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY APPROACHED THE DEPARTMENT TO SETTLE THE MATTER UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, WE PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW THESE APPEALS. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 6. IN THE RESULT, BOTH APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 15/02/2021. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO LANHI XKSLKBZ (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 15/02/2021. ITA NO. 943 & 944/JP/2019 DY CAO (TA), WESTERN RAILWAY VS. DCIT 3 *RANJAN VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- DY CAO (TA), WESTERN RAILWAY, AJMER. 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- DCIT, CPC(TDS), GHAZIABAD. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR. 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE {ITA NO. 943 & 944/JP/2019} VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASST. REGISTRAR