IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI DELHI DELHI DELHI BENCH BENCH BENCH BENCH A AA A : NEW DELHI : NEW DELHI : NEW DELHI : NEW DELHI (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, ,, , VICE PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT AND SMT MADHUMITA ROY SMT MADHUMITA ROY SMT MADHUMITA ROY SMT MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER , JUDICIAL MEMBER , JUDICIAL MEMBER , JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. ITA NO. ITA NO. ITA NO. 9467 9467 9467 9467 /DEL/20 /DEL/20 /DEL/20 /DEL/20 1 11 1 9 99 9 ASSESSMENT YEAR ASSESSMENT YEAR ASSESSMENT YEAR ASSESSMENT YEAR : : : : 2010 2010 2010 2010 - -- - 11 1111 11 M/S SHIVLOK LEASING AND M/S SHIVLOK LEASING AND M/S SHIVLOK LEASING AND M/S SHIVLOK LEASING AND FINANC FINANC FINANC FINANCE, 210 SHIVLOK HOUSE E, 210 SHIVLOK HOUSE E, 210 SHIVLOK HOUSE E, 210 SHIVLOK HOUSE- -- - II, COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, II, COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, II, COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, II, COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, KARAMPURA, DELHI KARAMPURA, DELHI KARAMPURA, DELHI KARAMPURA, DELHI PAN : PAN : PAN : PAN : AAACS2724E AAACS2724E AAACS2724E AAACS2724E VS. VS. VS. VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER INCOME TAX OFFICER INCOME TAX OFFICER INCOME TAX OFFICER , , , , WARD WARD WARD WARD- -- -6(2) 6(2) 6(2) 6(2), ,, , NEW DELHI NEW DELHI NEW DELHI NEW DELHI (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : SHRI . SATINDER PAUL, DIRECTOR RESPONDENT BY : SHRI . M BARANWAL, SR. DR DATE OF HEARING : 25 2525 25.11 .11.11 .11.2020 .2020 .2020 .2020 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 25 2525 25.11 .11.11 .11.2020 .2020 .2020 .2020 ORDER ORDER ORDER ORDER PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU, , , , VP VPVP VP : :: : THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEA R 2010-11 IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LEARNED CIT(A), NEW D ELHI DATED 17.10.2019. 2. THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE, VIDE ITS L ETTER DATED 27.10.2020, RECEIVED THROUGH EMAIL, HAS REQUESTED F OR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL FILED BY HIM AND STATED THAT THE ASSESSE E HAS OPTED TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE RELATING TO THE TAX ARREARS FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR UNDER CONSIDERATION UNDER THE VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHE ME, 2020. A CERTIFICATE TO THIS EFFECT UNDER SECTION 5(1) OF TH E DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020 HAS ALSO BEEN FILED. 3. LEARNED SENIOR DR HAS NO OBJECTION. ITA-9467/DEL/2019 2 4. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, WE ACCEPT THE REQUEST OF T HE ASSESSEE FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ABOVE DECISION WAS ANNOUNCED ON CONCLUSION OF VIRT UAL HEARING IN THE PRESENCE OF BOTH THE PARTIES ON 25 TH NOVEMBER, 2020. SD/- SD/- ( (( ( MADHUMITA ROY MADHUMITA ROY MADHUMITA ROY MADHUMITA ROY ) )) ) (G.S. PANNU (G.S. PANNU (G.S. PANNU (G.S. PANNU ) )) ) JUDICIAL JUDICIAL JUDICIAL JUDICIAL MEMBER MEMBER MEMBER MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT SH COPY FORWARDED TO: - 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR