NETIZEN ENGINEERING P. LTD., MUMBAI V. PR. CIT, CIRCLE-8, MUMBAI

ITA 949/MUM/2021

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 107 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 0999 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 2 month(s) 5 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 01-08-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2017-2018
• Appeal Filed On: 26-05-2021
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Section: 263

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JM & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, AM आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 949/Mum/2021 (ननधधारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2017-18) Netizen Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Manek Mahal, Flat No. 19 & 20, 6 th floor, 90 Veer Nariman Road, Churchgate, Mumbai- 400 020 बनाम/ Vs. Pr.CIT-8, R. No. 611, 6 th floor Aayakar Bhavan, M. K. Road, Mumbai-400020 स्थधयीलेखधसं./जीआइआरसं./PAN No. AABCR7570C (अपीलधथी/Appellant) : (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) अपीलधथीकीओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri Amit Khatiwala, Ld. AR प्रत्यथीकीओरसे/Respondent by : Dr. Mahesh Akhade, Ld. DR सुनवधईकीतधरीख/ Date of Hearing : 02.08.2022 घोर्णधकीतधरीख / Date of Pronouncement : 02.08.2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amit Shukla, Judicial Member: The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the assessee against the impugned order dated 26.03.2021, passed by Ld. PCIT-8, 2 I.T.A. No. 949/Mum/2021 Netizen Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai for the quantum of assessment passed u/s 263 r.w.s 143(3) for AY 2017-18. 2. At the outset, it is brought to our notice that assessee has filed an application dated 02.08.2022 for withdrawal of appeal, which are as under:- Please refer to the above appeal fixed for hearing before your Honour on 2.8.2022. In this connection, we under the instructions from our above named client have to state as under:- The above appeal is appeal against order passed u/s.263. Subsequent to the passing of the order u/s.263, the Assessing Officer has passed an order u/s.144 r.w.s.263 r.w.s.144B dated 23.3.2022. The assessee is in appeal before the CIT(A) against the said order. In view of the above, the assessee would riot like to pursue the above appeal and hence withdraws the above appeal. We deeply regret the inconvenience caused to your Honour and hope our client's request will be favourably considered. 3. Ld. DR did not have any objection to the said request of withdrawal. 3 I.T.A. No. 949/Mum/2021 Netizen Engineering Pvt. Ltd. 4. Considering the contents of the letter as mentioned above, we allow the request of the assessee for withdrawing the present appeal. 5. In the net result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed as withdrawn. Orders pronounced in the open court on 2 nd August, 2022. Sd/- Sd/- (Prashant Maharishi) (Amit Shukla) Accountant Member Judicial Member मुंबई Mumbai;नदनधंक Dated : 02/08/2022 Sr.PS. Dhananjay आदेशकीप्रतितितिअग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलधथी/ The Appellant 2. प्रत्यथी/ The Respondent 3. आयकरआयुक्त(अपील) / The CIT(A) 4. आयकरआयुक्त/ CIT- concerned 5. नवभधगीयप्रनतनननध, आयकरअपीलीयअनधकरण, मुंबई/ DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. गधर्ाफधईल / Guard File आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, .उि/सहायकिंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.Registrar) आयकरअिीिीयअतिकरण, मुंबई/ ITAT, Mumbai