RAMESH C.ULLAL, MUMBAI V. DCIT RG 22(2), MUMBAI

ITA 957/MUM/2011

• Counselvise Citation: 95719914 RSA 2011
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 7 month(s) 15 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 17-09-2013
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Next Hearing Date: 16-04-2015
• Assessment Year: 2007-2008
• Appeal Filed On: 02-02-2011
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SALMAN KHAN

Judgement Text

, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES D MUMBAI . . , , BEFORE SHRI I.P. BANSAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAJENDRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER . / ITA NO.957/MUM/2011 ' ' ' ' # # # # / ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08 MR. RAMESH C. ULLAL, 14, MAHAVIR VILLA, 119-120 GARODIA NAGAR, GHATKOPAR (E), MUMBAI -77 ' ' ' ' / VS. THE DCIT, RANGE 22(2), MUMBAI. $ ./ % ./ PAN/GIR NO. : AAIPU0208L ( $& / APPELLANT ) .. ( '($& / RESPONDENT ) $& ) / APPELLANT BY: NONE '($& * ) / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI SALMAN KHAN ' * + / DATE OF HEARING : 17/09/2013 ,-# * + / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 17/09/2013 . / O R D E R PER I.P.BANSAL, J.M: THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. IT IS DI RECTED AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY LD. CIT(A)-33,MUMBAI DATED 25/11/2010 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007- 08. 2. THIS APPEAL WAS EARLIER FIXED FOR HEARING ON 2 9/8/2013 WHEN IT WAS ADJOURNED TO 17/09/2013 AND THE DATE WAS DULY NOTED BY THE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ASSESSEE. HOWEVER, ON 17/9/2 013 NONE WAS PRESENT ON . / ITA NO.957/MUM/2011 ' ' ' ' # # # # / ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08 2 BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. ADJOURNMENT APPLICATION HAS ALSO NOT BEEN FILED. THEREFORE, IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CA SE, WE PRESUME THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THIS APPE AL. FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL REPORTED IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD.38 ITD 320 (DEL) AND THE DECISION OF THE HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (M.P) WE DISMISS THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IN LIMI NE. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. / +0 ' /+ * 1 / * + 23 4 ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 17/09/2013 . * ,-# 1 5'0 17/09/2013 - * 6 4 SD/- SD/- ( / RAJENDRA ) ( . . / I.P. BANSAL ) / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER / JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI; 5' DATED 17/09/2013 . . . . * ** * '+78 '+78 '+78 '+78 98#+ 98#+ 98#+ 98#+ / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. $& / THE APPELLANT 2. '($& / THE RESPONDENT. 3. : ( ) / THE CIT(A)- 4. : / CIT 5. 8;6 '+' , , / DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. 6< = / GUARD FILE. .' .' .' .' / BY ORDER, (8+ '+ //TRUE COPY// > >> > / 2 2 2 2 (DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, MUMBAI . ' . ./ VM , SR. PS