, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH, CHENNAI . . . , ! , ' # BEFORE SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI, M. BALAGANESH ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ I.T.A.NO.962/MDS./2017 / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2013-14 SMT.NAMBIAR SREE VIDHYA , NO.24-A, VILLA CHANTELLE HIGGINS ROAD, OOTACAMUND 643 001. VS. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, OOTACAMUND,THE NILGIRIS. [PAN EOBPS 2279 A ] ( $% / APPELLANT) ( &'$% /RESPONDENT) / APPELLANT BY : NONE /RESPONDENT BY : MR.S.BHARATHI, CIT D.R /DATE OF HEARING : 16 -01-2018 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 16 -01-2018 /O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE ARISES OUT OF THE ORD ER OF THE LD COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-3, COIMBATORE IN ITA NO. 358/15- 16 DATED 10.11.2016. 2. WHEN THE APPEAL WAS TAKEN UP FOR HEARING, NOBOD Y APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE TO PURSUE THE APPEAL. THERE FORE, WE ARE OF THE OPINION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN COND UCTING THE CASE, HENCE FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE TR IBUNAL IN THE CASE OF ITA NO.962/MDS./2017 :- 2 -: C.I.T. VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) LTD.(38 ITD 320) (DEL. ), WE HEREBY DISMISS THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF ASSESSEE IS DISMISS ED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT AFTER CONCLUSI ON OF HEARING ON THE 16 TH JANUARY, 2018. SD/- SD/- ( ! . . ! . '# ) ( N.R.S. GANESAN) / JUDICIAL MEMBER ( !$ % & '# ) (M. BALAGANESH) ' / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER '( /CHENNAI, )* /DATED: 16 TH JANUARY, 2018. K S SUNDARAM *# +, -, /COPY TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. /RESPONDENT 3. . ( ) /CIT(A) 4. . /CIT 5. ,/' 0 /DR 6. '1 2 /GF