IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH A, PUNE BEFORE SHRI SHAILENDRA KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO.964/PN/2012 (ASSTT.YEAR : 2008-09) SHRI PANKAJ KANPILE, M/S. LAXMI ELECTRONICS, VISHAL GARDEN BUILDING, CHAKAN, TAL : KHED, PUNE 410501 .. APPELLANT PAN NO.AOJPK 2029Q VS. DCIT, CIRCLE-8, PUNE .. RESPONDENT APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI RAJESH DAMOR DATE OF HEARING : 30-07-2013 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 30-07-2013 ORDER PER R.K. PANDA, AM : THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAI NST THE ORDER DATED 15-03-2012 OF THE CIT(A)-V, PUNE RELATI NG TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09. 2. DESPITE SERVICE OF NOTICE THROUGH RPAD (ACKNOWLEDGEMENT PLACED ON RECORD), NONE APPEARED O N BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AT THE TIME OF HEARING WHEN THE NAM E OF THE ASSESSEE WAS CALLED NOR ANY PETITION SEEKING ADJOUR NMENT OF THE CASE WAS FILED. THIS TYPE OF CONDUCT ON THE PA RT OF THE ASSESSEE SHOWS THAT HE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECU TING THE APPEAL FILED BY HIM. THEREFORE, FOLLOWING THE DECI SION OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF MULTI PLAN INDIA PVT. LTD. , REPORTED IN 2 38 ITD 320 AND THE DECISION OF HONBLE MADHYA PRADE SH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS CWT REPORT ED IN 213 ITR 480 WE DISMISS THE APPEAL AS UNADMITTED. HOWEV ER, IF THE ASSESSEE THROUGH PROPER APPLICATION CAN SATISFY THE BENCH FOR NON-APPEARANCE ON THE DATE OF HEARING, THE TRIBUNAL MAY AT ITS DISCRETION RECALL THE ORDER. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT AT THE TIME OF HEARING ITSELF, I.E. ON 30 TH JULY, 2013. SD/- SD/- (SHAILENDRA KUMAR YADAV) (R.K. PANDA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER PUNE, DATED : 30TH JULY 2013 SATISH COPY OF THE ORDER IS FORWARDED TO : 1. THE ASSESSEE 2. THE DEPARTMENT 3. THE CIT(A)-V, PUNE 4. THE CIT-V, PUNE 5. D.R. A BENCH, PUNE 6. GUARD FILE BY ORDER // TRUE COPY // SENIOR PRIVATE SECR ETARY, INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PUNE