, , , , , ,, , , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES C, MUMBAI . . , ! '# , $ BEFORE SHRI JOGINDER SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER, AND SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO.97/MUM/2011 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2006-07 DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1(2), ROOM NO.535, 5 TH FLOOR, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, M.K.ROAD, MUMBAI-400020 / VS. M/S ORIGINAL TRADING COMPANY PVT. LTD. 12/12, ESPLANADE, 3, A.K. NAIK MARG, FORT, MUMBAI-400001 ( '# / REVENUE) ( ()* /ASSESSEE) P.A. NO.AAACO 0577H '# + , + , + , + , / REVENUE BY SHRI J. PREMANAND - DR ()* + , + , + , + , / // / ASSESSEE BY): SHRI SANJAY PARIKH + *-! / / / / DATE OF HEARING : 29/01/2015 ./0 + *-! / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 29/01/2015 '1 '1 '1 '1 + *-! / DATE OF ORDER : 02/02/2015 '1 '1 '1 '1 / / / / O R D E R PER JOGINDER SINGH (JUDICIAL MEMBER) : THE REVENUE IS AGGRIEVED BY THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATE D 08/10/2010 OF THE LD. FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY, MU MBAI . THE REVENUE HAS RAISED THE FOLLOWING GROUND:- ON THE FACTS AND INTEREST THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN LAW, THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS ) ERRED IN DIRECTING THE ASSESSING OFFICER TO TAX THE ENTIRE S URPLUS OF M/S ORIGINAL TRADING COMPANY PVT. LTD . 2 RS.10,63,937/- AS SHORT TERM CAPITAL GAIN AGAINST B USINESS INCOME HELD BY ASSESSING OFFICER. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, LD. DR, SHRI R.N.DSOUZA , ADVANCED HIS ARGUMENTS WHICH ARE IDENTICAL TO THE GROUND RAI SED. HOWEVER, THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE , SHRI SA NJAY PARIKH, AT THE OUTSET, CONTENDED THAT THE TAX EFFECT IN THE PRESENT APPEAL IS RS. 2,25,453/- WHICH IS BELOW PRESCRIBED MONETA RY LIMIT FOR FILING THE APPEAL BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL. IT WAS FAI RLY AGREED BY THE LD. DR THAT THE TAX EFFECT IN THE PRESENT APPEAL IS BELOW PRESCRIBED MONETARY LIMIT. 2.1. WE HAVE CONSIDERED THE RIVAL SUBMISSIONS AND P ERUSED THE MATERIAL AVAILABLE ON RECORD. IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE TAX EFFECT IN THE APPEAL IS BELOW PRESCRIBED MONETARY L IMIT AS CONTAINED IN CBDT INSTRUCTION NO.3/2011 DATED 09/02 /2011, FURTHER INSTRUCTION NO.5/2014(F NO.279/MISC./ 142/2 007-IT(PT) DATED 10/07/2014. THE CBDT REVISED THE MONETARY LIM IT FOR FILING THE APPEAL BEFORE VARIOUS AUTHORITIES/COURTS AND ADVISED/DIRECTED THE DEPARTMENT NOT TO FILE APPEAL IN THE CASES WHERE THE TAX EFFECT DOES NOT EXCEED THE FOLLOWING MONETARY LIMITS:- SL. NO. APPEALS IN INCOME TAX MATTERS MONETARY LIMIT (IN R S.) 1. BEFORE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 4,00,000/- 2. U/S 260 A BEFORE HIGH COURT 10,00,000/- 3. BEFORE SUPREME COURT 25,00,000/- AS PER THE AFORESAID INSTRUCTION, THE DEPARTMENT IS NOT TO FILE APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL WHEREIN THE TAX EFF ECT IS LESS THAN RS.4,00,000/-, CONSEQUENTLY, CONSIDERING THE DECISI ON FROM THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF PI THWA M/S ORIGINAL TRADING COMPANY PVT. LTD . 3 ENGINEERING WORKS (276 ITR 519) (BOM ) , THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS NOT MAINTAINABLE, THEREFORE, DISMISSED. THIS ORDER WAS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT IN THE PRESENCE OF LD. REPRESENTATIVE FROM BOTH SIDES AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE HEARING ON 29/01/2015. '1 + ./0 2'3 29/01/2015 / + 9 SD/- (N.K.BILLAIYA) SD/- (JOGINDER SINGH) ! '# ! '# ! '# ! '# / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER '# '# '# '# / JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI; 2' DATED : 02/02/201 5 F{X~{T? P.S/. .. '1 + :* ;0* '1 + :* ;0* '1 + :* ;0* '1 + :* ;0*/ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. <= / THE APPELLANT 2. :><= / THE RESPONDENT. 3. ? ( ) / THE CIT, MUMBAI. 4. ? / CIT(A)- , MUMBAI 5. A9 :* , , / DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. 9B( C / GUARD FILE. '1 '1 '1 '1 / BY ORDER, >* :* //TRUE COPY// D DD D/ // /E ' E ' E ' E ' (DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) , , , , / ITAT, MUMBAI