VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES (SMC), JAIPUR JH HKKXPUN] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI BHAGCHAND, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER VK;DJ VIHY LA-@ ITA NO. 974/JP/2015 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2009-10 RAVI BAL NIKETAN SOCIETY 153, SANTOSH SAGAR COLONY BRAHMPURI,JAIPUR CUKE VS. THE ITO WARD- 5(1), JAIPUR LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO .: AAATR 7448 D VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS@ ASSESSEE BY: SHRI MUKESH KHANDELWAL, CA JKTLO DH VKSJ LS@ REVENUE BY :SHRI R.A. VERMA, ADDL CIT-. DR LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 25/07/2016 ?KKS'K .KK DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 25/07/2016 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER BHAGCHAND, AM THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED AN APPEAL AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-3, JAIPUR DATED 01-09-2015 FOR THE ASSESSME NT YEAR 2009-10. 2. DURING THE COURSE OF HEARING, THE LD. AR OF ASSE SSEE VIDE HIS APPLICATION DATED 22-7-2016 HAS REQUESTED FOR WITH DRAWAL OF THE APPEAL FOR WHICH THE LD. DR HAS NO OBJECTION. HENCE, WE AL LOW TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL. ITA NO. 974/JP/2015 RAVI BAL NIKETAN SOCIETY VS. ITO , WARD- 5(1), JAIP UR . 2 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED AS WITHDRAWN AS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 25-07-2016. SD/- HKKXPUN ( BHAGCHAND) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 25 /07/ 2016 *MISHRA VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSF'KR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- RAVI BAL NIKETAN SAMITI, JAIPUR 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- THE ITO, WARD- 5(1), JAIPUR 3. VK;DJ VK;QDRVIHY@ CIT(A). 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT, 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 974/JP/2015) VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ @ ASSISTANT. REGISTRAR