IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “B” DELHI BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.978/DEL/2020 Assessment Year 2009-10 Gardenia Shelters Pvt. Ltd. E-16A, Sector-61, Noida Uttar Pradesh Vs. ACIT (TDS) Circle-74(1) New Delhi TAN/PAN: AADCG4091K (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: None Respondent by: Shri Sanjay Kumar Yadav, Sr.DR Date of hearing: 10 05 2023 Date of pronouncement: 08 08 2023 O R D E R PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, A.M.: T he capt ione d a ppeal has bee n file d by t he assess ee a gainst the order of the l d. Co mmiss ione r of Income Ta x (A ppe als ), D elhi-38 (‘C IT (A )’ in short) da ted 12. 12. 2019 ar ising fr om the assess me nt orde r dat ed 30. 03. 20 16 pass ed by th e Assessing O fficer (A O ) und er Sec tion 201(1)/ 20 1(1A ) of the Inco me Tax A ct, 1961 ( the A ct) conce rni ng A Y 2009 -10. 2. A s per i ts groun ds of appea l, t he a ssessee has c ha lle nge d the ac tion of the A ssessi ng O ffic er for t rea ting t he assesse e as assessee in defaul t t ow ar ds fa il ure to deduct and deposi t t ax as re qui red unde r pr ovisio ns of C ha pt er X V IIB of t he Act t ow a rds amount as leas e re nt of Rs. 15,81, 849/- pa id t o No ida Authorit y in the Fi na nc ial Y ea r 2008- 09 relevan t to Ass ess ment Yea r 2009- 10 I.T.A. No.978/Del/2020 2 in ques ti on. 3. N one appeared for t he assessee des pi te r epea te d opportunit ies. T he notice se nt to t he assessee at the addr ess pro vi ded i n a ppe al me mo has ret urned back unse rved. T he assessee has remai ned ind ole nt and has not shown any interes t i n de fe nding t he mat ter. Accordingl y, the matt er is proc eeded ex - par te. 4. A s per the case reco rds, the assess ee has re lied u pon the judgment of H on’ ble D elhi H igh C our t in the case of Ra jes h Project s (Ind ia) P vt. Ltd. vs. C IT (T D S)- II, (2017) 78 taxm an.com 263 (D el ) to s eek redressa l from the T ribun al. In the absence of an y assist ance fr om t he assess ee, i t app ea rs di fficult to asc ertain exac t f ac ts i n the conte xt of w hic h the j udgment of th e H onb ’le D elhi High C ourt i s urged t o be app li ed. 5. In the in te re st of subs tant ial j ust ic e, we remit t he ma tter back to the file of the CIT (A ) for fresh a dj udic at ion o f t he issu e af te r giving p rope r opp ort uni t y to the asse ssee in th is re ga rd. It sha ll b e open t o the assess ee to adduce such e vidences and explana tio ns as may be cons idered expedie nt to defend i ts case. 6. In the r esu lt, the appeal of t he a ssessee is allow ed f or sta tis ti ca l purpos es . Order pronounced in the open Court on 08/08/2023 Sd/- Sd/- [CHANDRA MOHAN GARG] [PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA] JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: /08/2023 Prabhat