, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A, BENC H KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI WASEEM AHMED, AM & SHRI K. NARASIMHA C HARY, JM ./ ITA NO.98/KOL/2014 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR :2006-2007) M/S PODDAR JEWELLERS, 176A, S.P.MUKHERJEE ROAD, KOLKATA-700026 VS. ITO, WARD-29(3), KOLKATA ./ ./PAN/GIR NO. : AAHFP 3012 A ( /APPELLANT ) .. ( / RESPONDENT ) /ASSESSEE BY : NONE /REVENUE BY : SHRI DULAR CH. MANDAL / DATE OF HEARING : 04/10/2016 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 04/10/2016 / O R D E R PER SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY, JM: THIS APPEAL BY ASSESSEE IS ARISING OUT OF ORDER DAT ED 18.11.2013, PASSED BY CIT(A)-XVI, KOLKATA, FOR THE ASSESSMENT Y EAR 2006-2007, IN THE MATTER OF IMPOSITION OF PENALTY U/S.271(1)(B) O F THE I.T.ACT. 2. NONE APPEARED FOR AND ON BEHALF OF ASSESSEE AT THE TIME OF HEARING OF THIS APPEAL. AT THE OUTSET, IT IS NOTICED THAT THIS APPEAL WAS ADJOURNED EARLIER ON 20-7-16 AT THE BEHEST OF THE ASSESSEE AN D THE APPEAL WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 04.10.2016. TODAY, I.E. ON 04.10.20 16 ALSO NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF ASSESSEE. THIS BEING APPEAL FILED IN 2014, IT SEEMS THAT ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEA L AS NONE IS PRESENT BEFORE US AT THE TIME OF HEARING. HENCE, THE APPEA L OF ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION APPLYING THE DECISION OF HONBLE DELHI TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320 . ITA NO.98/14 2 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF ASSESSEE IS DISMISS ED . ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THIS 04/10 /2016. SD/ - (WASEEM AHMED) SD/ - (NARASIMHA CHARY) $ / MEMBER ACCOUNTANT $ / JUDICIAL MEMBER /KOLKATA ; $% DATED 04/10/2016 & ()* /PRAKASH MISHRA , . / PS %&' (' / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : / BY ORDER, / ( ASSTT. REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT. 3. 4 ( ) / THE CIT(A), KOLKATA. 4. 4 / CIT 5. 56 7 8 , 8 , / DR, ITAT, KOLKATA 6. 7 9 / GUARD FILE. 5 //TRUE COPY//