, C IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL C BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMEBR I.T(SS).A. NO. 277/AHD/2014 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2010-11) ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA / VS. M/S. SIMANDHAR CONSTRUCTION S/202, SHRI RAM CHAMBERS, MALHAR POINT, OLD PADRA ROAD, BARODA - 391020 / / PAN/GIR NO. : ABIFS0469E ( / APPELLANT ) .. ( / RESPONDENT ) / APPELLANT BY : SHRI S. K. DEV, SR. D.R. / RESPONDENT BY : NONE / DATE OF HEARING 22/10/2018 !'# / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 02/11/2018 / O R D E R PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA - AM: THE CAPTIONED APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED AT THE INSTANCE OF THE REVENUE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-IV, AHMEDABAD (CIT(A) IN SHORT), DATED 23.04.2014 ARISING IN THE PENALTY ORDER DATED 27.09.2013 PASSE D BY THE IT(SS)A NO.277/AHD/14 [ACIT VS. M/S. SIMANDHAR CONS TRUCTION] A.Y. 2010-11 - 2 - ASSESSING OFFICER (AO) UNDER S. 271AAA OF THE INCOM E TAX ACT, 1961 (THE ACT) CONCERNING ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11. 2. THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL RAISED BY THE REVENUE REA DS AS UNDER:- 1. ON THE FACTS AND IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CA SE, THE LD. CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN LAW AND ON FACTS IN DELETING THE PENALTY OF RS. 10,29,500/- LEVIED U/S.271AAA OF THE I T ACT. 3. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, IT WAS SUBMITTED BY THE LD.AR FOR THE ASSESSEE THAT THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE I S HIT BY RECENTLY ISSUED CBDT CIRCULAR NO.3 OF 2018 DATED 11/07/2018 REVISING THE PREVIOUS THRESHOLDS PERTAINING TO TAX EFFECTS. AS PER AFORESAID CIRCULAR, ALL PENDING APPEALS FILED BY REVENUE ARE LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED AS A MEASURE FOR REDUCING LITIGATION WHER E THE TAX EFFECT DOES NOT EXCEED THE PRESCRIBED MONETARY LIMIT WHICH IS NOW REVISED AT RS.20 LAKHS. IN THE INSTANT CASE, THE T AX EFFECT ON THE DISPUTED ISSUES RAISED BY THE REVENUE IS STATED TO BE NOT EXCEEDING RS.20 LAKHS AND THEREFORE APPEAL OF THE R EVENUE IS REQUIRED TO BE DISMISSED IN LIMINE . 4. THE LEARNED DR FOR THE REVENUE FAIRLY ADMITTED T HE APPLICABILITY OF THE CBDT CIRCULAR NO. 3 OF 2018. A CCORDINGLY, APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED AS NOT MAINTAINA BLE. HOWEVER, IT(SS)A NO.277/AHD/14 [ACIT VS. M/S. SIMANDHAR CONS TRUCTION] A.Y. 2010-11 - 3 - IT WILL BE OPEN TO THE REVENUE TO SEEK RESTORATION OF ITS APPEAL ON SHOWING INAPPLICABILITY OF THE AFORESAID CBDT CIRCU LAR IN ANY MANNER. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISM ISSED. SD/- SD/- (MAHAVIR PRASAD) (PRADIP KUMA R KEDIA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD: DATED 02/11/2018 TRUE COPY S. K. SINHA !'#' / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO:- & / REVENUE 2 / ASSESSEE ( ) *+ , / CONCERNED CIT 4 ,- / CIT (A) / 012 33*+4 *+#4 56) / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 7 289 : / GUARD FILE. BY ORDER / 4 / 5 *+#4 56) THIS ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 02/11/201 8