1 | P A G E IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL JABALPUR BENCH, JABALPUR BEFORE SHRI NRS GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SH RI SANJAY ARORA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MA NOS. 02 & 04/JAB/2019 (A/OO IT(SS)A NOS.38 & 40/JAB/2013) ASSESSMENT YEARS:2001-02 & 2004-05 SHRI NEERAJ KUMAR GUPTA, KATNI (M.P.) (PAN AGNPG 9113F) VS. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE, KATNI (APPELLANT ) (RESPONDENT) IT(SS)A NOS. 14 TO 20/JAB/2013 ASSESSMENT YEARS:1999-2000 TO 2005-06 SHRI SURESH KUMAR GUPTA, KATNI (M.P.) (PAN: ADBPG 6238J) VS. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE, KATNI (APPELLANT ) (RESPONDENT) IT(SS)A NOS. 28 TO 32/JAB/2013 ASSESSMENT YEARS:1999-2000 TO 2001-02 & 2004-05 TO 2005-06 SMT. UMA GUPTA, KATNI (M.P.) (PAN: AFOPG 9616D) VS. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE, KATNI (APPELLANT ) (RESPONDENT) IT(SS)A NOS. 33 TO 35/JAB/2013 ASSESSMENT YEARS:1999-2000, 2001-02 & 2002-03 SHRI PANKAJ KUMAR GUPTA, KATNI (M.P.) (PAN: AGNPG 9110G) VS. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE, KATNI (APPELLANT ) (RESPONDENT) 2 | P A G E APPELLANT BY SHRI DHIRAJ GHAI, CA RESPONDENT BY SMT. NEERJA PRADHAN, CIT -DR DATE OF HEARING 01/02/2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT /02/2021 IT(SS)A NO. 01/JAB/2019 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2010-2011 SHRI VIKRAM SINGH, SATNA (M.P.) (PAN: AYLPS 4186L) VS. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL (I), BHOPAL (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ITA NO. 73/JAB/2019 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2015-2016 SHRI MAHENDRA SINGH, SATNA (M.P.) (PAN: AKLPS 4857N) VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SATNA (APPELLANT ) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY SHRI SAPAN USRETHE, ADVOCATE RESPONDENT BY SMT. NEERJA PRADHAN, CIT -DR DATE OF HEARING 01/02/2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT /02/2021 ITA NO. 246/PUN/2017 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2008-2009 LT. COL. RAJEEV BENJAMIN LYALL, JABALPUR (M.P.) (PAN: AASPL6156G) VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(1), PUNE (APPELLANT ) (RESPONDENT) 3 | P A G E APPELLANT BY SHRI MANOJ JAIN, CA RESPONDENT BY SHRI I B KHANDEL,DR DATE OF HEARING 01/02/2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT /02/2021 ORDER PER BENCH: IN ALL THESE APPEALS AND APPLICATIONS, REQUEST FOR BEING PERMITTED TO WITHDRAW THE SAME HAS BEEN RECEIVED FROM THE CONCER NED ASSESSEE/S, STATING OF HAVING AVAILED VIVAAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020, AND HAVING ALSO PAID TAX, WHEREVER AND TO THE EXTENT DUE. THERE WAS, DURING H EARING, NO OBJECTION TO THE SAME, OR COULD RATHER POSSIBLY BE, FROM THE LD. DEP ARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE. UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES, WE HAVE NO HESITATION IN PERMITT ING WITHDRAWAL OF THE CAPTIONED APPEALS AND APPLICATIONS. 2. IN THE RESULT, ALL THE CAPTIONED APPEALS AND APP LICATIONS ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON FEBRUARY 01, 2021 SD/- SD /- (N.R.S.GANESAN) (SANJAY ARORA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT ME MBER DATED: 01/02/2021 // TRUE COPY //