SHRI MANOJ KUMAR GOYAL, RAIPUR V. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAIPUR

ITSSA 32/RPR/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 104 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 7764 (ITAT-RAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 5 month(s) 9 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax (Search & Seizure) Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 23-11-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 13-06-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR – VIRTUAL COURT BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER IT(SS)A Nos. 30 to 36/RPR/2018 िनधा रण वष / Assessment Years : 2008-09 to 2014-15 Manoj Kumar Goyal Santoshi Nagar, Boria Road, Raipur (C.G.) PAN : AEXPG9381B Vs. ACIT, Central Circle-1, Raipur Appellant Respondent आदेश / ORDER These 7 appeals by the assessee are directed against the common order dated 16.04.2018 passed by the CIT(A)-1, Raipur in relation to the assessment years 2008-09 to 2014-15. 2. Before us, the assessee has filed common letters dated 05.10.2021 seeking withdrawal of the appeals. The relevant contents (except appeal particulars) of such letters read as under : “With reference to the above subject, it is humbly submitted that, in the instant case of the appeal, the appellant prefers to settle the case under DTVS, 2020 for which the Form-3 has been issued by the competent authority which is enclosed for your ready reference. Moreover, as per settled tax amounting to Rs.1,140/- the appellant has also paid on 25.09.2021 vide Challan No.00682. In view of the above, you are requested to allow the withdrawal of the instant appeal as per conditions of the scheme and give the appropriate order for the same so that the same will be attached separately during filing of Form-4 at the earliest.” Assessee by None (withdrawal application) Revenue by Shri G.N. Singh Date of hearing 24-11-2021 Date of pronouncement 24-11-2021 IT(SS)A Nos. 30 to 36/RPR/2018 Manoj Kumar Goyal 2 3. The ld. DR did not raise any objection to the withdrawal of the appeals filed by the assessee. As such, the assessee is permitted to withdraw the appeals. 4. In the result, the appeals are dismissed as ‘withdrawn’. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 24 th November, 2021 Sd/- Sd/- (S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI) (R.S.SYAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT पुणे Pune; दनांक Dated : 24 th November, 2021 Satish आदेश आदेशआदेश आदेश क क क क ितिलिप ितिलिप ितिलिप ितिलिप अ ेिषत अ ेिषतअ ेिषत अ ेिषत / Copy of the Order is forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ / The Appellant; 2. यथ / The Respondent; 3. आयकर आयु (अपील) / The CIT (Appeals)-1, Raipur 4. The PCIT-1, Raipur 5. DR, ITAT, Raipur; 6. गाड फाईल / Guard file. // True copy // आदेशानुसार आदेशानुसारआदेशानुसार आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune IT(SS)A Nos. 30 to 36/RPR/2018 Manoj Kumar Goyal 3 Date 1. Draft dictated on 24-11-2021 Sr.PS 2. Draft placed before author 24-11-2021 Sr.PS 3. Draft proposed & placed before the second member JM 4. Draft discussed/approved by Second Member. JM 5. Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS Sr.PS 6. Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS 7. Date of uploading order Sr.PS 8. File sent to the Bench Clerk Sr.PS 9. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk 10. Date on which file goes to the A.R. 11. Date of dispatch of Order.