, A IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T(SS).A. NO. 61/AHD/2016 ( ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2011-12) THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), AHMEDABAD / VS. SARGON INFRABUILD PVT. LTD. PLOT NO. 386, SECTOR-8, GANDHINAGAR 382 008 / / PAN/GIR NO. : AAMCS7986E ( APPELLANT ) .. ( / RESPONDENT ) / APPELLANT BY : SHRI S. K. DEV, SR. D.R. / RESPONDENT BY : ASTHA MANIAR, A.R. DATE OF HEARING 12/10/2018 !'# / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 17/10/2018 / O R D E R PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA - AM: THE CAPTIONED APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED AT THE INSTANCE OF THE REVENUE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-12, AHMEDABAD (CIT(A) IN SHORT), DATED 29.09.2015 ARISING IN THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 31.03.2014 PA SSED BY THE IT(SS)A NO.61/AHD/15 [DCIT VS. SARGON INFRABUILD PVT. LTD.] A.Y. 2011-12 - 2 - ASSESSING OFFICER (AO) UNDER S. 143(3) R.W.S. 153A( 1)(B) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (THE ACT) CONCERNING ASSESSMEN T YEAR 2011- 12. 2. THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL RAISED BY THE REVENUE REA DS AS UNDER:- 1. ON THE FACTS AND IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CA SE AND IN LAW, THE LD. CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN LAW AND /OR ON FACTS IN DELETING THE A DDITION OF RS.25,00,000/- MADE ON ACCOUNT OF UNDISCLOSED INCOME. 3. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, IT WAS SUBMITTED BY THE LD.AR FOR THE ASSESSEE THAT THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE I S HIT BY RECENTLY ISSUED CBDT CIRCULAR NO.3 OF 2018 DATED 11/07/2018 REVISING THE PREVIOUS THRESHOLDS PERTAINING TO TAX EFFECTS. AS PER AFORESAID CIRCULAR, ALL PENDING APPEALS FILED BY REVENUE ARE LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED AS A MEASURE FOR REDUCING LITIGATION WHER E THE TAX EFFECT DOES NOT EXCEED THE PRESCRIBED MONETARY LIMIT WHICH IS NOW REVISED AT RS.20 LAKHS. IN THE INSTANT CASE, THE T AX EFFECT ON THE DISPUTED ISSUES RAISED BY THE REVENUE IS STATED TO BE NOT EXCEEDING RS.20 LAKHS AND THEREFORE APPEAL OF THE R EVENUE IS REQUIRED TO BE DISMISSED IN LIMINE . 4. THE LEARNED DR FOR THE REVENUE FAIRLY ADMITTED T HE APPLICABILITY OF THE CBDT CIRCULAR NO. 3 OF 2018. A CCORDINGLY, IT(SS)A NO.61/AHD/15 [DCIT VS. SARGON INFRABUILD PVT. LTD.] A.Y. 2011-12 - 3 - APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED AS NOT MAINTAINA BLE. HOWEVER, IT WILL BE OPEN TO THE REVENUE TO SEEK RESTORATION OF ITS APPEAL ON SHOWING INAPPLICABILITY OF THE AFORESAID CBDT CIRCU LAR IN ANY MANNER. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISM ISSED. SD/- SD/- (RAJPAL YADAV) (PRADIP K UMAR KEDIA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD: DATED 17/10/2018 TRUE COPY S. K. SINHA !'#' / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO:- & / REVENUE 2 / ASSESSEE ( ) *+ , / CONCERNED CIT 4 ,- / CIT (A) / 012 33*+4 *+#4 56) / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 7 289 : / GUARD FILE. BY ORDER / 4 / 5 *+#4 56) THIS ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 17/10/201 8