IVRCL INDORE GUJARAT TOLLWAYS LIMTED,HYDERABAD V. DCIT., CIRCE-2(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 1427/HYD/2025

AI Insights

The case involves IVRCL Indore Gujarat Tollways Ltd, the appellant, contesting an order from the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), which had dismissed their appeal for non-prosecution. The original dispute arose from an assessment order under section 147 read with section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning the Assessment Year 2019-20. The assessee had raised several grounds, including issues related to unaccounted purchases and excess purchase disallowances. However, the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal due to the assessee's failure to comply with procedural notices. The tribunal, upon review, noted the absence of adjudication on specific grounds despite the procedural dismissal and remanded the case for a comprehensive review on merits.

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 786095 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 month(s) 26 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 31-10-2025
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: DB-A
• Assessment Year: 2019-2020
• Appeal Filed On: 04-09-2025
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Keywords: Opportunity of being heard; Principle of natural justice; Procedural lapse
• Section: 147

Judgement Text

" ITA No 1427 of 2025 IVRCL Indore Gujarat Tollways Ltd Page 1 of 4 आयकर अपीलȣय अͬधकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘ DB-A ‘ Bench, Hyderabad ŵी रिवश सूद,Ɋाियक सद˟ एवं ŵी मधुसूदन साविड़या लेखा सद˟ समƗ | Before Shri Ravish Sood, Judicial Member A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia, Accountant Member आ.अपी.सं /ITA No.1427/Hyd/2025 (िनधाŊरण वषŊ/Assessment Year: 2019-20) M/s IVRCL Indore Gujarat Tollways Ltd, Hyderabad PAN:AACCI2461C Vs. Dy.CIT Circle 2 (1) Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधाŊįरती Ȫारा/Assessee by: N o n e राज̾ व Ȫारा/Revenue by:: Smt. U. Mini Chandran, CIT(DR) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of hearing: 28/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 31/10/2025 आदेश/ORDER Per Madhusudan Sawdia, A.M.: This appeal is filed by IVRCL Indore Gujarat Tollways Ltd, (“the assessee”), feeling aggrieved by the order passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (“Ld. CIT(A)”), dated 08.07.2025 for the A.Y. 2019-20. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: “1. The order of the CIT(A) is in gross violation of the provisions of law and hence is bad in law. 2 The CIT(A) has erred in upholding the order of the Assessing Officer and dismissing the appeal. Printed from counselvise.com ITA No 1427 of 2025 IVRCL Indore Gujarat Tollways Ltd Page 2 of 4 3. The CIT(A) has erred in upholding the levy of demand for unaccounted purchases made. 4. The CIT(A) has erred in upholding the disallowance of expenditure on account of excess purchase. 5. The CIT(A) has erred in upholding the assessment u/s 144. 6. Any other ground that may considered at the time of hearing”. 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee had filed an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) against the order passed by the Learned Assessing Officer (“Ld. AO”) under section 147 read with section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) dated 13.02.2024 for the Assessment Year 2019–20. However, the assessee did not comply with the notices issued by the Ld. CIT(A). Consequently, the Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal for non- prosecution and non-compliance. Aggrieved by the said order, the assessee preferred the present appeal before this Tribunal. 4. When the appeal was called for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee, nor was any adjournment petition filed. Therefore, the appeal is proceeded ex parte qua the assessee, based on the material available on record, after hearing the submissions of the Learned Departmental Representative (“Ld. DR”). 5. The Ld. DR supported the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and submitted that the Ld. CIT(A) had provided adequate opportunities to the assessee to present its case. Despite several notices issued through the ITBA portal, the assessee failed to file any written submissions or to appear on the dates fixed for hearing. It was further contended that the conduct of the assessee shows Printed from counselvise.com ITA No 1427 of 2025 IVRCL Indore Gujarat Tollways Ltd Page 3 of 4 complete disregard to the appellate proceedings. The Ld. CIT(A), being left with no alternative, was justified in dismissing the appeal for non-prosecution. The Ld. DR accordingly prayed that the order of the Ld. CIT(A) be upheld. 6. We have considered the submissions of the Ld. DR and perused the orders of the authorities below. It is evident from the appellate order that the Ld. CIT(A) had dismissed the appeal in limine on account of non-compliance. However, on perusal of the same, we observe that the assessee had raised specific grounds, including Ground No. 1 (placed at page no. 2 of the CIT(A)’s order), wherein it was contended that the Ld. AO had not considered the written submission dated 30.01.2024 filed in response to the final show-cause notice dated 25.01.2024. Despite such a specific ground being raised, the Ld. CIT(A) has not adjudicated the same on merits. Even in an ex parte appellate order, the Ld. CIT(A) is statutorily bound under section 250(6) of the Act to dispose of each ground of appeal by passing a speaking and reasoned order on merits. Failure to do so amounts to a procedural irregularity rendering the appellate order unsustainable in law. Therefore, in our considered view, the dismissal of the appeal merely for non- prosecution without adjudicating the specific grounds raised by the assessee is contrary to the settled principles of natural justice. Accordingly, we are of the opinion that this issue requires reconsideration by the Ld. CIT(A). Therefore, in the interest of substantial justice, we deem it appropriate to remand the matter to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) with the following directions: a. The Ld. CIT(A) shall provide adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee and shall adjudicate the appeal afresh on Printed from counselvise.com ITA No 1427 of 2025 IVRCL Indore Gujarat Tollways Ltd Page 4 of 4 merits, by passing a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law. b. The assessee shall be at liberty to file all necessary documentary evidence and written submissions in support of its contentions. c. The assessee is also directed to cooperate in the appellate proceedings and not to seek unnecessary adjournments so as to enable timely disposal of the appeal. 7. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in the above terms. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 31st October, 2025. Sd/- Sd/- (RAVISH SOOD) JUDICIAL MEMBER (MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Hyderabad, dated 31st October, 2025 Vinodan/sps Copy to: S.No Addresses 1 IVRCL Indore Gujarat Tollways Ltd, 8-2-350/A-24/1-B2 Panchavati Colony, Vijayanagar Colony S.O Hyderabad 500057 2 Dy. CIT, Circle 2(1) Signature Towers, Hyderabad 500084 3 Pr. CIT - Hyderabad 4 DR, ITAT Hyderabad Benches 5 Guard File By Order Printed from counselvise.com "