JAGRAN PRAKASHAN LTD,2014-15 V. JCIT, SPECIAL RANGE, KANPUR, KANPUR

ITA 171/LKW/2022

AI Insights

The case involves Jagran Prakashan Ltd., which filed appeals against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15. The appeals were initially dismissed by the CIT(A) on the grounds that the appellant had opted for the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, treating the appeals as withdrawn. However, the assessee argued that the appeals were still alive and requested restoration for a hearing. The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's request and set aside the CIT(A)'s orders, restoring the appeals for a fresh decision.

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 36923 (ITAT-LUCKNOW)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 06-02-2025
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2014-2015
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: NAMITA S. PANDEY
• Keywords: Condonation of delay; Set aside; Opportunity of being heard; Revised return
• Section: 115JB

Judgement Text

"Page 1 of 5 Page 1 of 5 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH ‘A’, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SUBHASH MALGURIA, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No.170 & 171/Lkw/2022 Assessment Year: 2013-14 & 14-15 Jagran Prakashan Ltd., 2, Jagran Building, Sarvodaya Nagar, Kanpur. PAN:AAACJ3404A Vs. Jt.C.I.T., Special Range, Kanpur. (Appellant) (Respondent) O R D E R PER SUBHASH MALGURIA, J.M. These two appeals have been filed by assessee for assessment year 2013-14 & 14-15 against impugned appellate order dated 29/06/2022 (DIN & Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022-23/1043647148(1) and dated 11/07/2022 (DIN & Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022-23/1043788605(1) passed by learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [“CIT(A)” for Appellant by None (written submissions) Respondent by Smt. Namita S. Pandey, CIT (D.R.) Page 2 of 5 Page 2 of 5 short]. For the sake of convenience these two appeals are decided through this consolidated order. 2. Both the appeals filed by the assessee are beyond the time limit prescribed u/s 253(3) of the I. T. Act. An application dated 23rd September, 2022 was filed by the assessee requesting for condonation of delay in filing of the appeals. Giving detailed description of the facts and circumstances, which caused the delay in filing of the appeals, the assessee has submitted that reasons for late filing of the appeals were really beyond his control and requested that the delay in filing these appeals may be condoned. The learned D.R. for Revenue expressed no objection to condonation of delay and admitting the appeals for hearing. In view of the foregoing, and being convinced with the reasons given by assessee, the delay in filing of these appeals is condoned and the appeals are admitted for decision on merits. 3. In this case the assessee filed its return of income for assessment year 2013-14 on 29/11/2013 declaring nil income. The assessee filed revised income on 18/03/2015 declaring nil income. The assessee further revised return on 08/05/2014 declaring nil income. The assessment was completed and the income was assessed at Rs.2,51,81,37,310/- u/s 115JB of the I. T. Act. For assessment year 2014-15, the assessee filed return of income on 28/11/2014 at nil income which was revised on 16/02/2016 Page 3 of 5 Page 3 of 5 declaring nil income. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment and assessed the income of the assessee at Rs.1,90,31,04,190/-. Being aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal for both the assessment years i.e. 2013-14 and 2014-15 before the learned CIT(A). The learned CIT(A) dismissed both the appeals observing that since the appellant has opted for Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. Aggrieved with the order of learned CIT(A), now the assessee is in appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 4. During the course of hearing before us, the assessee was represented by none. Under these facts, we have heard learned D.R. and have considered the materials placed on record. In this case, the learned CIT(A) has dismissed both the appeals observing that since the appellant has opted for Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. The assessee’s claim is that M/s Crystal Sound & Music Pvt. Ltd., Bombay that had amalgamated with M/s Jagran Prakashan Ltd. by virtue of order passed by Hon'ble Bombay High Court and appeals of M/s Crystal sound & Music Pvt. Ltd. Bombay were also pending before the learned CIT(A), the assessee vide, its application dated 8th March, 2021 had requested the learned CIT(A) to treat the appeals of M/s Crystal Sound and Music Private Limited as covered under Vivad Se Viswas and requested to allow the company to Page 4 of 5 Page 4 of 5 withdraw the appeals. The said letter written to learned CIT(A) is reproduced as under: Page 5 of 5 Page 5 of 5 The assessee’s claim is that the appeals filed by Jagran Prakashan Ltd. on 11/02/2017 were very much alive and assessee is very much interested to pursue its appeals and the orders passed by learned CIT(A) are misconceived. The assessee has requested to restore both the appeals for hearing before the learned CIT(A). In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the orders passed by learned CIT(A) are set aside and both the appeals are restored back to the file of learned CIT(A) to pass de novo orders for deciding the appeals on merits in accordance with law after providing reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. 5. In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes. (Order pronounced in the open court on 06/02/2025) Sd/. Sd/. (ANADEE NATH MISSHRA) (SUBHASH MALGURIA) Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated:06/02/2025 *Singh Copy of the order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. Concerned CIT 4. The CIT(A) 5. D.R. ITAT, Lucknow Asstt. Registrar "