JAYDEEP DASHRATHBHAI PATEL,GANDHINAGAR V. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEAL), FACELESS ASSESSMENT

ITA 1564/AHD/2024

AI Insights

The case involves Jaydeep Dashrathbhai Patel, the appellant, who appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)/National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, which had arisen from an order under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2017-18. The primary issue was the addition of Rs. 16,22,500 as unexplained cash deposits in the bank account of the assessee. The Assessing Officer had treated these deposits as income from an undisclosed source due to the assessee's failure to provide a satisfactory explanation or evidence regarding the source of these deposits. The CIT(A) upheld this addition, leading to the current appeal before the Tribunal.

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 470079 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 24-03-2025
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2017-2018
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: ASHOK KUMAR SUTHAR
• Section: 143(3); 68

Judgement Text

"THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD “SMC” BENCH Before Shri Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member Jaydeep Dashrathbhai Patel, Vas Village Chandrala, Nr. N.H. No. 8, Village Chandrala, Gandhinagar PAN: AVOPP7017K (Appellant) Vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), Faceless Appeal (Respondent) Assessee by: None Revenue by: Shri Ashok Kumar Suthar, Sr. D.R. Date of hearing : 04-03-2025 Date of pronouncement : 24-03-2025 आदेश/ORDER The present appeal has been filed by the Assessee against the order passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)’] dated 10.07.2024 arising out of the order passed u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (here-in-after referred to as “the Act”) relevant to the Assessment Year 2017-18. ITA No. 1564/Ahd/2024 Assessment Year 2017-18 I.T.A No. 1564/Ahd/2024 A.Y. 2017-18 Jaydeep Dashrathbhai Patel vs. CIT(A) 2 2. The assessee in this appeal has agitated against the deduction of addition of Rs. 16,22,500/- made by the Assessing Officer on account of unexplained cash deposits in the bank account of the assessee. 3. An application for adjournment has been placed on record on behalf of the assessee. A perusal of the case file records show that identical adjournments have been filed by the assessee time and again. Under the circumstances, it can be gathered that the assessee is filing adjournment applications without any valid cause/reason, therefore, the adjournment request filed on behalf of the assessee is hereby rejected and I proceed to decide the appeal after hearing ld. Departmental Representative and going through the records. 4. During the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee during the year had made cash deposits of Rs. 16,22,500/- in his bank account. He asked the assessee about the source of the said deposits. However, the assessee did not file any reply to the notices issued by the Assessing Officer. Under the circumstances, the Assessing Officer held that the assessee has nothing to say regarding the source of said deposits. He treated the said deposits as income of the assessee from undisclosed source and made the impugned addition u/s. 68 of the income Tax Act. I.T.A No. 1564/Ahd/2024 A.Y. 2017-18 Jaydeep Dashrathbhai Patel vs. CIT(A) 3 5. Before the ld. CIT(A), the assessee pleaded that the aforesaid deposits were out of the earlier cash withdrawals from his bank account, however necessary evidences and documents in support of the aforesaid pleadings were not furnished. Therefore, the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee. 6. Being aggrieved by the said order of the CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal. 7. The assessee has placed a paper book on the file wherein the copy of the bank statements etc. have been filed. The main plea of the assessee in this case is that the amount of cash deposits of Rs. 16,22,500/- was out of the earlier withdrawals. However, a perusal of the copy of the saving bank would show there are multiple entries of deposits and withdrawals. There may be instances wherein cash withdrawals have been re-deposited and there may be instances where the deposits would show to have not been made out of withdrawals. I, therefore, restore the matter to the file of Assessing Officer to examine the contentions of the assessee from the documents/evidences furnished by the assessee including the bank statements and thereafter pass the order afresh in accordance with law. I.T.A No. 1564/Ahd/2024 A.Y. 2017-18 Jaydeep Dashrathbhai Patel vs. CIT(A) 4 8. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 24-03-2025 Sd/- (Sanjay Garg) Judicial Member Ahmedabad : Dated 24/03/2025 आदेश क\u0006 \u0007\bत ल प अ\u000fे षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. Assessee 2. Revenue 3. Concerned CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. Guard file. By order/आदेश से, उप/सहायक पंजीकार आयकर अपील\u0012य अ\u0013धकरण, अहमदाबाद "