KALIKAVU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,MALAPPURAM V. ITO, WARD 2, TIRUR

ITA 352/COCH/2025

AI Insights

The case involves the Kalikavu Service Co-op. Bank Ltd., which appealed against the orders of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, for the Assessment Years 2013-14 and 2017-18. The primary issue was the denial of deduction under section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Tirur, which was upheld by the CIT(A). The Tribunal examined whether the appellant, a co-operative society, was entitled to deductions for profits derived from business under section 80P, specifically in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. CIT, which clarified the applicability of section 80P to co-operative societies engaged in banking.

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 668867 (ITAT-COCHIN)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 25-06-2025
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Assessment Year: 2017-2018
• Other Referred Cases: Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. CIT [2021] 431 ITR 1 (SC)
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: LEENA LAL
• Assessee Lawyers: HUSSAIN K.
• Section: 143(3)

Judgement Text

"IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM AND SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JM ITA Nos. 351 & 352/Coch/2025 Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2017-18 Kalikavu Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. .......... Appellant Kalikavu, Malappuram 676525 [PAN: AAAAK3734C] vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Tirur .......... Respondent Appellant by: Shri Hussain K., Advocate Respondent by: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing: 13.06.2025 Date of Pronouncement: 25.06.2025 O R D E R Per: Inturi Rama Rao, AM These appeals filed by the assessee are directed against different orders of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 29.03.2025 for Assessment Years (AY) 2013-14 and 2017-18. 2. Since identical issues and facts are involved in these appeals, they are heard together and disposed of by this common order. 3. For the sake of convenience and clarity the facts relevant to the appeal bearing ITA No. 351/Coch/2025 for AY 2013-14 are stated herein. 2 ITA Nos. 351 & 352/Coch/2025 Kalikavu Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. 4. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant is a co-operative society registered under the Kerala State Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The return of income for AY 2013-14 was filed on 31.03.2015 declaring Nil income after claiming deduction u/s. 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) of Rs. 34,70,728/-. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the ITO, Ward 2, Tirur (hereinafter called \"the AO\") vide order dated 03.02.2016 passed u/s. 143(3) of the Act at a total income of Rs. 59,20,233/-. While doing so, the AO made addition u/s. 80P of the Act of Rs. 77,35,765/- 5. Being aggrieved, an appeal was filed before the CIT(A), who vide the impugned order confirmed the action of the AO. 6. Being aggrieved, the appellant is in appeal before this Tribunal in the present appeal. 7. We have heard the rival contentions and perused the material available on record. Since the appellant is a co-operative society classified as primary agricultural credit co-operative society, the appellant is entitled for deduction in respect of profits derived from business u/s. 80P of the Act, this issue is no longer res integra, as it is covered by the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. CIT [2021] 431 ITR 1 (SC) wherein it was held as under: - “To sum up, therefore, the ratio decidendi of Citizen Co-operative Society Ltd. (supra), must be given effect to. Section 80P of the Income- tax Act, being a benevolent provision enacted by Parliament to encourage and pro- mote the credit of the co-operative sector in general 3 ITA Nos. 351 & 352/Coch/2025 Kalikavu Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. must be read liberally and reasonably, and if there is ambiguity, in favour of the assessee. A deduction that is given without any reference to any restriction or limitation cannot be restricted or limited by implication, as is sought to be done by the Revenue in the present case by adding the word \"agriculture\" into section 80P(2)(a) (i) when it is not there. Further, section 80P(4) is to be read as a proviso, which proviso now specifically excludes co-operative banks which are co-operative societies engaged in banking business, i.e., engaged in lending money to members of the public, which have a licence in this behalf from the RBI. Judged by this touchstone, it is clear that the impugned Full Bench judgment is wholly incorrect in its reading of Citizen Co-operative Society Ltd. (supra). Clearly, therefore, once section 80P(4) is out of harm's way, all the assessees in the present case are entitled to the benefit of the deduction contained in section 80P(2)(a) (i), notwithstanding that they may also be giving loans to their members which are not related to agriculture, Also, in case it is found that there are instances of loans being given to non-members, profits attributable to such loans obviously cannot be deducted.” 8. Respectfully following the above decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, we hold that the assessee is entitled for deduction under sections 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. 9. Since identical issues and facts are involved in assessee’s appeal ITA No. 352/Coch/2025, our findings in ITA No. 351/Coch/2025 shall apply mutatis mutandis to this appeal also. 10. In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stand allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on 25th June, 2025. Sd/- Sd/- (SONJOY SARMA) JUDICIAL MEMBER (INTURI RAMA RAO) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Cochin, Dated: 25th June, 2025 n.p. 4 ITA Nos. 351 & 352/Coch/2025 Kalikavu Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. Copy to: 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. The Pr. CIT concerned 4. The Sr. DR, ITAT, Cochin 5. Guard File By Order Assistant Registrar ITAT, Cochin "