KRISHNAN CHINNADURAI,CHENNAI V. ITO NON CORP. WARD 10(1), CHENNAI

ITA 698/CHNY/2025

AI Insights

The case involves Shri Krishnan Chinnadurai, an illiterate individual engaged in milk trading, who appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi. The appeal was initially delayed due to the assessee's lack of knowledge about the income tax return filing and appeal procedures, which was compounded by his illiteracy. The Tribunal noted the ex-parte nature of the previous proceedings due to the assessee's non-compliance and non-cooperation, primarily because he did not respond to notices sent via email. The Tribunal, considering the principles of natural justice, decided to restore the case to the AO for a fresh assessment, provided the assessee pays a specified cost and cooperates in future proceedings.

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 398251 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 04-06-2025
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2017-2018
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: PRYATI SHARMA
• Assessee Lawyers: Y. SRIDHAR
• Keywords: Principle of natural justice

Judgement Text

"आयकर अपीलȣय अͬधकरण, ‘ए’ Ûयायपीठ, चेÛनई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI Įी जॉज[ जॉज[ क े, उपाÚय¢ एवं Įी एस.आर.रघुनाथा, लेखा सदèय क े सम¢ BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENTAND SHRI S.R. RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.: 698/CHNY/2025 िनधाᭅरण वषᭅ/Assessment Year:2017-18 Shri Krishnan Chinnadurai, No.9, Perumal Reddy Street, Southupakkam Road, Redhills, Chennai – 600052. PAN: APCPC 6564J Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Non-Corporate Ward 10(1), Chennai. (अपीलाथᱮ/Appellant) (ᮧ᭜यथᱮ/Respondent) अपीलाथᱮ कᳱ ओर से/Appellant by : Shri Y. Sridhar, FCA ᮧ᭜यथᱮ कᳱ ओर से/Respondent by : Ms. Pryati Sharma, JCIT सुनवाई कᳱ तारीख/Date of Hearing : 04.06.2025 घोषणा कᳱ तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 04.06.2025 आदेश /O R D E R PER GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT: This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 08.11.2023, passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called ‘the Act’). The relevant Assessment Year is 2017-18. - 2 - ITA No.698/CHNY/2025 2. There is a delay of 401 days in filing the appeal. The assessee has filed condonation petition along with affidavit stating therein the reasons for belated filing of this appeal. The reasons stated in the affidavit for belated filing is that, the assessee is an illiterate and engaged in the business of milk trading. The assessee being uneducated, was unaware of the income tax returns filing, appeal procedure, consequences of non-filing of IT returns or non- compliance of IT notices/orders and the time limit for filing the appeal. The assessee came to know about the assessment order only when he received the notice dated 06.01.2025 to recover the outstanding demand. Thereafter, the assessee took steps to contact the Income Tax professional and filed appeal before the Tribunal, resulting in a delay of 401 days. On perusal of the same, we find there is sufficient reason for delay in filing this appeal before the Tribunal. Hence, we condone the delay in filing the appeal and proceed to dispose off the appeal on merits. 3. At the very outset, we notice that the CIT(A)’s order is ex- parte, since there was no compliance from the assessee to the seven notices issued from the office of the First Appellate Authority. Further, we also note that the assessment has been completed on best judgment basis u/s.144 of the Act. - 3 - ITA No.698/CHNY/2025 5. The Ld.AR submitted that the assessee is an individual running a proprietorship concern in the name of M/s. Lakshmi Foods mainly dealing with Heritage Milk and Milk products. He further submitted that the assessee is an illiterate and has no knowledge about verifying emails. Hence, the assessee failed to take note of hearing notices sent through email, resulting in non-cooperation of assessee during the assessment proceedings and appellate proceedings. It was prayed in the interest of justice and equity, the issue may be restored to the files of the AO as a last opportunity for proper representation of his case. 6. The ld.DR submitted that adequate opportunities were provided from the offices of the AO and the CIT(A) and there is no violation of principles of natural justice. Therefore, it was prayed the appeals of the assessee may be dismissed. 7. We have heard rival submissions and perused the materials on record. The proceedings before the AO as well as the CIT(A) was ex-parte, since the assessee did not respond to various notices issued. We strongly deprecate the nonchalant attitude of the assessee in not responding to the notices issued from the offices of the AO and the CIT(A). However in the interest of justice and fair - 4 - ITA No.698/CHNY/2025 play, we are of the view that the matter ought to be restored to the files of the AO with a condition assessee pays a cost of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only). Therefore, subject to payment of Rs.5,000/- to be paid to Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority at the Hon’ble High Court of Madras, the matter is restored to the files of the AO. The amount of Rs.5,000/- shall be paid within a month’s time from the date of receipt of this order and assessee shall produce the receipt for the said payment before the AO. Accordingly, the matter is remitted to the files of the AO for fresh adjudication. The AO shall afford reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is directed to co-operate with the Revenue and shall not seek unnecessary adjournment. It is ordered accordingly. 8. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 4th June, 2025 at Chennai. Sd/- Sd/- (एस.आर. रघुनाथा) (S.R. RAGHUNATHA) लेखा सदèय/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (जॉज[ जॉज[ क े) (GEORGE GEORGE K) उपाÚय¢ /VICE PRESIDENT चेÛनई/Chennai, Ǒदनांक/Dated, the 4th June, 2025 RSR - 5 - ITA No.698/CHNY/2025 आदेश कȧ ĤǓतͧलͪप अĒेͪषत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथȸ/Appellant 2. Ĥ×यथȸ/Respondent 3. आयकर आयुÈत /CIT, Chennai 4. ͪवभागीय ĤǓतǓनͬध/DR 5. गाड[ फाईल/GF. "