LIZ HEMANGBHAI BHATT,AHMEDABAD V. THE ITO, WARD-5(1)(2) PRESENT JAO- THE DYCIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

ITA 1374/AHD/2025

AI Insights

The case involves Liz Hemangbhai Bhatt, the appellant, who filed appeals against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), which were passed ex-parte due to non-prosecution by the assessee. The appeals were related to assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12, concerning both quantum and penalty issues under sections 144 and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal noted previous non-cooperation by the assessee and imposed costs but decided to remand the case for a fresh assessment to ensure justice.

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 792464 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 5 month(s) 2 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 02-12-2025
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 30-06-2025
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Keywords: Additional evidence
• Section: 144; 271(1)(c)

Judgement Text

" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD “SMC” BENCH Before: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar, Judicial Member And Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha, Accountant Member Liz Hemangbhai Bhatt 301,A Devpreet, Apartment, Near Akasmeen Bunglow, Bodakdev, Ahmedabad Gujarat-380054, India PAN: ADTPB9174C (Appellant) Vs Income Tax Officer Ward-5(1)(2), Ahmedabad Jurisdiction AO: The DCIT Circle-3(1)(1), Ahmedabad, (Respondent) Assessee Represented: Ms. Arti N Shah, A.R. Revenue Represented: Smt. Ananya Kulshresth, Sr.D.R. Date of hearing : 28-11-2025 Date of pronouncement : 02-12-2025 आदेश/ORDER PER BENCH:- These four appeal are filed by the Assessee as against four separate appellate orders all dated 20.03.2025 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, (in short referred to as “CIT(A)”), arising out of the exprate assessment orders passed under section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Penalty orders under section 271(1)(c) of the Act ITA Nos. 1374 to 1377/Ahd/2025 Assessment Years: 2010-11 & 2011-12 Printed from counselvise.com I.T.A Nos. 1374 to 1377/Ahd/2025 A.Ys. 2010-11 & 2011-12 Page No Liz Hemangbhai Bhatt VS. ITO 2 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to Assessment Years 2010-11 & 2011-12 respectively. 2. The registry has noted that there is a delay of 30 days in filing the above appeals. The Ld. Counsel appearing for the assessee stated that she has not received email hearing notices on 02-12- 2024, 30-12-2024, 27-01-2025 and 18-02-2025 but the Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeals for non-prosecution vide common order dated 20-03-2025. However perusal of Form No. 35 filed before Ld. CIT(A), assessee categorically mentioned not to send hearing notices by email. Thus when the assessee verified the Income Tax portal came to know about the exparte appellate orders passed by Ld. CIT(A) both on quantum appeals as well as penalty appeals orders. Thus there is a delay of 30 days in filing the above appeals and requested to condone the delay. 3. The Ld. Sr. D.R. appearing for the Revenue submitted that this is the second round of appeal before this Tribunal. In the first round of appeal, Ld. Tribunal vide order dated 10-02-2023 in ITA Nos. 714 to 717/Ahd/2019 set-aside appeals to the file of Ld. CIT(A) for fresh consideration. However the assessee again not participated in the hearing before Ld. CIT(A). Therefore the appeals are liable to be dismissed. 4. We have given our thoughtful consideration and perused the materials available on record. In the first round of appeal before Ld. CIT(A), assessee filed written submission and also vide letter dated 22-02-2018 requested to admit additional evidences invoking Rule Printed from counselvise.com I.T.A Nos. 1374 to 1377/Ahd/2025 A.Ys. 2010-11 & 2011-12 Page No Liz Hemangbhai Bhatt VS. ITO 3 46A of the I.T. Rules. The assessee also furnished Remand Report dated 08-03-2019 submitted by the A.O. Finally when Ld.CIT(A) fixed the appeal for hearing on 25-03-2019, assessee sought for adjournment which was rejected by Ld. CIT(A) and dismissed the appeals filed by the assessee. Therefore this Tribunal vide order dated 10-02-2023 in ITA Nos. 714 to 717/Ahd/2019 set-aside the matter back to the file of Ld. CIT(A) to decide the appeals on merits. 4.1. In the present impugned orders passed by Ld. CIT(A), four opportunities of hearing given on 02-12-2024, 30-12-2024, 27-01- 2025 and 18-02-2025. However as it can be seen from Form No. 35, the assessee not sought for email hearing notices but instead of sending physical hearing notices the Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeals again for non-prosecution. However looking into the assessment order also for the Asst. Year 2010-11, assessee has not filed the Return of Income. In the next Asst. Year 2011-12, assessee filed the Return of Income and various additional documents were filed before Ld. CIT(A) invoking Rule 46A of the ITAT Rules. 5. Considering the non-cooperation by the assessee and to meet the ends of justice, we deem it fit to impose cost of Rs.10,000/- each on the quantum appeals and Rs.5,000/- each on the penalty appeals, thereby totaling to Rs.30,000/- payable by the assessee to the Income Tax Department within two weeks of receipt of copy of this order. On production of the same before Jurisdictional Assessing Officer, we direct the JAO to entertain the additional documents filed by the assessee and give one more opportunity of hearing to the assessee and decide the cases on merits and in accordance Printed from counselvise.com I.T.A Nos. 1374 to 1377/Ahd/2025 A.Ys. 2010-11 & 2011-12 Page No Liz Hemangbhai Bhatt VS. ITO 4 with the provisions of law. Needless to say, assessee should cooperate by furnishing all necessary details before Jurisdictional Assessing Officer. 7. In the result, all the four appeals filed by the Assessee are allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 02-12-2025 Sd/- Sd/- (NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA) (T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Ahmedabad : Dated 02/12/2025 आदेश कȧ ĤǓतͧलͪप अĒेͪषत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. Assessee 2. Revenue 3. Concerned CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. Guard file. By order/आदेश से, उप/सहायक पंजीकार आयकर अपीलȣय अͬधकरण, अहमदाबाद Printed from counselvise.com "