M/S. ANKUR GRAND OWNERS ASSOCIATION,CHENNAI V. ITO, NCW-10(1), CHENNAI

ITA 480/CHNY/2025

AI Insights

The case involves M/s. Ankur Grand Owners Association, a flat residents welfare association, which appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding the assessment year 2017-18. The primary contention was the incorrect taxation of interest income of Rs.7,88,673/- under 'Income from other Sources' while the association reported a net loss of Rs.3,48,510/- for the year. The Assessing Officer had rejected the expenditure claimed against the interest income based on the concept of mutuality, leading to the appeal. The Tribunal examined the financials and the application of Section 70(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which allows set-off of losses from one source against income from another source under the same head of income.

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 313096 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 28-04-2025
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: C
• Assessment Year: 2017-2018
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: ANITHA
• Assessee Lawyers: B. RAMAKRISHNAN; F
• Keywords: Set aside

Judgement Text

"आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘सी’ Ɋायपीठ, चेɄई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI ŵी मनु क ुमार िगįर, Ɋाियक सद˟ एवं ŵी एस. आर. रघुनाथा, लेखा सद˟ क े समƗ BEFORE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S. R. RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.:480/Chny/2025 िनधाŊरण वषŊ / Assessment Year: 2017-18 M/s.Ankur Grand Owners Association, 252-253, Ankur Grand, Poonamalle High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010. vs. Income Tax Officer, Non-Corporate Ward - 10(1), Chennai – 600 034. [PAN:AABAA-4133-E] (अपीलाथŎ/Appellant) (ŮȑथŎ/Respondent) अपीलाथŎ की ओर से/Appellant by : Mr. B.Ramakrishnan, F.C.A. ŮȑथŎ की ओर से/Respondent by : Ms. Anitha, Addl. CIT सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 22.04.2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 28.04.2025 आदेश /O R D E R PER S. R. RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: This appeal of the assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), Addl/JCIT(A), Agra dated 30.12.2024 for the assessment year 2017-18. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:- (a) The Order of the Learned Addl. /Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is contrary to the law, facts and circumstances of the case. (b) For that the Learned Additional/Joint commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in law and on facts by failing to apply :-2-: ITA. No:480/Chny/2025 the provisions of Section 70(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which explicitly permits the set-off of losses from one source against income from another source under the same head of income. (c) For that the Learned Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in not allowing to set off of losses from one source under the head income from other sources amounting to Rs.11,37,183/- against another source under the same head of income being the interest income of Rs.7,88,673/-. 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a flat residents welfare association. The assessee filed its return of Income for the A.Y. 2017- 18 on 03.11.2017 admitting Nil Total Income. The return of income was processed u/s. 143(1) of the Act. Subsequently the case was selected for limited scrutiny under CASS for verification of issue (i) Deduction against income from other sources and statutory notices were issued. The assessee filed the Income and Expenditure account for the financial year 2016-17 of the association showing the net loss of Rs.3,48,510/-, comprising of income of Rs.7,88,673/- on account of interest earned. However, the AO passed an order u/s.143(3) of the Act dated 17.10.2019 by bringing interest income of Rs.7,88,673/- to tax under ‘Income from other Sources’ by rejecting the expenditure claimed against such receipts u/s.57(iii) of the Act as the concept of mutuality. 4. Aggrieved by the order of the AO, the assessee preferred an appeal before the ld.CIT(A), NFAC. 5. The ld.AR for the assessee submitted that assessee has not claimed any deductions on account of concept of mutuality and the total collections of the association during the year was Rs.22,95,973/- against a total expenditure :-3-: ITA. No:480/Chny/2025 of Rs.26,44,483/- and thereby incurring net loss of Rs.3,48,510/-. In support of the above the assessee filed audited financials as on 31.03.2016 as well as 31.03.2017 along with the entire set of Form ITR-5 (Return of Income) for the A.Y.2017-18, which were produced before the lower authorities. Hence, the ld.CIT(A) has erred by treating the interest income of Rs.7,88,673/- included in the total collections of Rs.22,95,973/- which is not the surplus earned by the association, to tax it under the head income from other sources. Therefore, the ld.AR prayed for deleting the same by setting aside the order of the CIT(A). 6. Per contra the ld.DR supported the orders of the lower authorities. 7. We have heard both the parties perused the material available on record, gone through the orders of the lower authorities. Admittedly the assessee is a Flat Owners Association registered under Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act 1975. The assessee has filed its return of income regularly since its inception. We find that the assessee has incurred net loss during the year to tune of Rs.3,48,510/- after considering the interest receipt from the bank to the tune of Rs.7,88,673/-. Further, the association has collected the contributions from the members to the tune of Rs.15,07,300/- along with the interest income of Rs.7,88,673/- totaling to Rs.22,95,973/- and incurred total expenditure of Rs.26,44,483/- resulting in net loss of Rs.3,48,510/- during the assessment year 2017-18. Since the assessee has not earned any surplus during the impugned assessment year even after considering the interest receipt of Rs.7,88,673/-, we are of the view that the lower authorities have erred considering the interest income separately as income from other :-4-: ITA. No:480/Chny/2025 sources. Therefore, in the present facts and circumstances of the case, we set aside the order of the ld.CIT(A) and direct the AO to delete the additions made and recompute the income as per return of income filed by the assessee by allowing the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee. 8. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on 28th April, 2025 at Chennai. Sd/- Sd/- (मनु क ुमार िगįर) (MANU KUMAR GIRI) Ɋाियक सद˟/Judicial Member (एस. आर. रघुनाथा) (S. R. RAGHUNATHA) लेखासद˟/Accountant Member चेɄई/Chennai, िदनांक/Dated, the 28th April, 2025 SP आदेश की Ůितिलिप अŤेिषत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथŎ/Appellant 2. ŮȑथŎ/Respondent 3.आयकर आयुƅ/CIT– Chennai/Coimbatore/Madurai/Salem 4. िवभागीय Ůितिनिध/DR 5. गाडŊ फाईल/GF "