M/S. DIACH CHEMICALS & PIGMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED,HOWRAH V. PR. CIT (CENTRAL), KOLKATA - 2, KOLKATA

ITA 697/KOL/2025

AI Insights

The case involves M/s Diach Chemicals & Pigments Pvt. Ltd., the appellant, contesting a revisionary order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, issued by the PCIT, Kolkata. Initially, the assessee's return for the assessment year 2018-19 was scrutinized and assessed, leading to a reassessment order that included additions for bogus purchases and delayed payments. Subsequently, the PCIT invoked section 263, setting aside the reassessment order and directing a new assessment. The appellant challenged this revisionary order, arguing that the basis for the revision (the reassessment order) had already been quashed by the Tribunal, rendering the PCIT's order void ab initio.

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 712117 (ITAT-KOLKATA)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 25-07-2025
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Assessment Year: 2018-2019
• Other Referred Cases: ITA No. 1642/Kol/2024
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Keywords: Bogus purchase; Search and seizure; Bogus
• Section: 147; 143(3); 263; 132; 69C; 2

Judgement Text

"IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA Before Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member and Shri Rakesh Mishra, Accountant Member I.T.A. No.697/Kol/2025 Assessment Year: 2018-19 M/s Diach Chemicals & Pigments Pvt. Ltd.………....Appellant NH-6, Jaladhulagori Dhulaghar Industrial Park, Howrah-711302. [PAN: AACCD1101A] vs. PCIT, Central-2, Kolkata…..……………..………………….…..... Respondent Appearances by: Shri Sunil Surana, FCA appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri Raja Sengupta, CIT-DR, appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : July 22, 2025 Date of pronouncing the order : July 25, 2025 आदेश / ORDER Per Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member: This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 29.03.2025 Passed by the Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT), Kolkata, under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2018-19. 2. Brief Facts of the Case the assessee fled its return of income for the assessment year 2018-19 declaring total income of Rs.3,24,05,910/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and assessment was completed under section 143(3) of the Act on 23.04.2021 determining assessed income at Rs.4,75,81,150/-. Subsequently, pursuant to a search and seizure operation under section 132 of the Act in the case of the Diach Group conducted on 07.12 2021 and subsequent dates, the Assessing Officer reopened the case under section 147 and passed a reassessment order dated 28.03 2023. In the reassessment order, the AO made an addition of Rs.96,84,5467/- on account of bogus purchases under Printed from counselvise.com I.T.A. No.697/Kol/2025 M/s Diach Chemicals & Pigments Pvt. Ltd 2 section 69C and Rs.7,34,624/- on account of delayed payment of PF/ESI, thereby determining total income at Rs.1451,61,241/- . 3. Later, the Ld. PCIT invoked jurisdiction under section 263 of the Act and passed a revisionary order dated 29.03.2025 setting aside the reassessment order dated 28.03.2023 with a direction to reframe the assessment. 4. Aggrieved by the above order assessee is appeal before this tribunal at the time of hearing the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the reassessment order dated 28.03.2023, which is the very basis for the revision proceedings under section 263, had already been quashed by this Tribunal vide order dated 20.12 2024 in ITA No. 1642/Kol/2024. It was contended that since the reassessment order no longer survives, the exercise of revisionary jurisdiction by the ld. PCIT over a non-existent order is void ab initio and not sustainable in law. The assessee also submitted that specific objections regarding the maintainability of the revision proceedings were raised before the Ld. PCIT during the proceedings, but the same were not considered. 5. The Ld. Departmental Representative supported the order passed by the Ld. PCIT. However, he fairly admitted that the reassessment order dated 28.03.2023, which was the subject matter of revision, had already been quashed by this Tribunal prior to the passing of the revisionary order. 6. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. It is an admitted position that the reassessment order dated 28.03.2023 passed under section 147 of the Act was quashed by this Tribunal vide order dated 20.12.2024 in ITA No. 1642/Kol/ 2024. Thus, as on the date of passing the revisionary order under section 263, i.e., 29.03.2025, there was no subsisting assessment order which could be revised. It is a settled principle of law Printed from counselvise.com I.T.A. No.697/Kol/2025 M/s Diach Chemicals & Pigments Pvt. Ltd 3 that no revisionary jurisdiction can be exercised under section 263 over a non-existent or quashed order. Once the foundation of the revision proceeding (i.e., the reassessment order) is removed, the superstructure built upon it (i.e., the 263 order) must fall. Therefore, the revision order dated 29.03.2025 passed by the Ld. PCIT is rendered infructuous and unsustainable in law. In view of the above discussion and settled legal position, we hold that the revision proceedings initiated and the order passed under section 263 of the Act are without jurisdiction and bad in law. Accordingly, we quash the order dated 29.03.2025 passed under section 263 of the Act. 7. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed. Kolkata, the 25th July, 2025. Sd/- Sd/- [Rakesh Mishra] [Sonjoy Sarma] लेखा सदèय/Accountant Member ÛयाǓयक सदèय/Judicial Member Dated: 25.07.2025. RS Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. Appellant - 2. Respondent - 3.CIT (A)- 4. CIT- , 5. CIT(DR), //True copy// By order Assistant Registrar, Kolkata Benches Printed from counselvise.com "