" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘E‘ BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI GAGAN GOYAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.2270/Mum/2024 (Assessment Year :2013-14) M/s. Klaus Waren Fixtures Pvt. Ltd. C-25, Floor-2 Plot No.13, Shree Ram Industrial Estate G.D. Ambedkar Marg Wadala (W) Mumbai – 400 031 Vs. Asst. CIT Circle 6(3)(2), Mumbai PAN/GIR No.AACCK3740J (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Kiran Vadher Revenue by Shri P.D. Chougule (Addl.CIT) Sr. DR Date of Hearing 11/07/2024 Date of Pronouncement 03/10/2024 आदेश / O R D E R PER AMIT SHUKLA (J.M): The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the assessee against order dated 30/03/2024 passed by NFAC, Delhi for the A.Y.2013-14. 2. In the grounds of appeal assessee has raised following grounds:- ITA No.2270/Mum/2024 Klaus Waren Fixtures Pvt. Ltd. 2 “i) The Id CIT (A) erred in confirming the action of Assessing Officer to ignore the mandate of Sec. 115BBE(2) which is neither a debatable point nor an accidental slip but a rectifiable mistake apparent on the record, therefore not allowing the set-off of unabsorbed depreciation of earlier years as accepted by the Revenue amounts to denying the legitimate adjustment in the computation of Book profit u/s 115JB, hence, the Order u/s. 154 is bad in law and the benefit of adjustment may be granted. ii) Without prejudice to above, the amended provision of Sec. 115BBE(2) applicable w.e.f AY 2017-18 is prospective by implication and any form of clarificatory note or proposal cannot override the bare provision of Sec 115BBE(2) rw s.115JB: therefore, computing incorrect Book Profit and ignoring the mandate of bare provision is not a debatable point but a rectifiable mistake in need of judicial attention, hence, the dismissal of 1st appeal is uncalled for iii) Without further prejudice to above, the insertion of word 'shall presupposes the mandatory implication of the provision of 115BBE(2) and thus, binding on both Revenue and the Assessee as well.” 3. The limited issue here is, whether the addition which was made u/s.68 in the quantum proceedings is to be set off against the losses in the A.Y.2013-14. Here in this case, the addition was made u/s.68 for sums aggregating to Rs.5,12,73,350/-. The issue which has been raised before the ld. AO as well as before the ld. CIT(A) in the application u/s.154 that ld. AO was not justified in denying the assessee benefit of set off of brought forward losses by applying the proviso to Section 115BBE and thereby, application for rectification u/s.154. The assessee had filed return of income for A.Y.2013-14 within the due date i.e. 29/09/2013 declaring total loss of Rs. 1,75,16,739/- and carried ITA No.2270/Mum/2024 Klaus Waren Fixtures Pvt. Ltd. 3 forward loss of Rs.12,55,08,000/-. The ld. AO in his order u/s.154 has held that Section 115BBE (2) specifically speaks of no deduction in respect of any expenditure of allowances. The ld. CIT(A) too has confirmed the said order of the ld. AO. 4. Provisions of Section 115BBE reads as under:- 115BBE. (1) Where the total income of an assessee,— (a) includes any income referred to in section 68, section 69, section 69A, section 69B, section 69C or section 69D and reflected in the return of income furnished under section 139; or (b) determined by the Assessing Officer includes any income referred to in section 68, section 69, section 69A, section 69B, section 69C or section 69D, if such income is not covered under clause (a), the income-tax payable shall be the aggregate of— (i) the amount of income-tax calculated on the income referred to in clause (a) and clause (b), at the rate of sixty per cent; and (ii) the amount of income-tax with which the assessee would have been chargeable had his total income been reduced by the amount of income referred to in clause (i). (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, no deduction in respect of any expenditure or allowance or set off of any loss shall be allowed to the assessee under any provision of this Act in computing his income referred to in clause (a) and clause (b) of sub-section (1). 5. In sub-section (2), it has been provided that no deduction in respect of any expenditure or allowance or set off of any loss shall be allowed has been brought by way of amendment w.e.f. 01/04/2017 i.e. from A.Y.2017-18. Earlier, there was no such condition that addition made u/s.68 to 69D will not be allowed ITA No.2270/Mum/2024 Klaus Waren Fixtures Pvt. Ltd. 4 to be set off. This position has been clarified by CBDT Circular No.11 of 2019 which reads as under:- ITA No.2270/Mum/2024 Klaus Waren Fixtures Pvt. Ltd. 5 6. Thus, CBDT has clearly clarified that since the set off of loss have been specifically inserted only by the Finance Act, 2016 w.e.f. 01/04/2017 and therefore, assessee is entitled to set off of losses against income determined u/s.115BBE till the A.Y.2016- ITA No.2270/Mum/2024 Klaus Waren Fixtures Pvt. Ltd. 6 17. Accordingly, we direct the ld. AO to allow the set off of losses against the addition made u/s.68 in view of the aforesaid Circular which is binding on the ld. AO. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee is allowed. 7. In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed. Order pronounced on 3rd October, 2024. Sd/- (GAGAN GOYAL) Sd/- (AMIT SHUKLA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Mumbai; Dated 03/10/2024 KARUNA, sr.ps Copy of the Order forwarded to : BY ORDER, (Asstt. Registrar) ITAT, Mumbai 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent. 3. CIT 4. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. Guard file. //True Copy// "