"•w IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASFUR WRIT PETITION (T) NO.\"Z&. OF 2015 < PETITIONER /-M/S SUNIL RE-ROLLERS & STEELS PVT. LTD., HAVING ITS OFFICE AT HOUSE N0. 11, JAL VlHAR COLONY, RAIPUR, 492001 (C.G.) AND HAVING TTS WORKS AT 560, INDUSTRIAL AREA, URLA RAIPUR P.S. & P.0. URLA, RAIPUR (C.G.). THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SlGNATORY AND DlRECTOR, SANJAY NACHRANI, S/0 MOHAN LAL NACHRANI, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDENT OF PSM 4, PANCHSHEEL NAGAR, ClVIL LlNES, POLICE STATION ClVIL LlNES, RAIPUR (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA, MlNISTRY OF FlNANCE, THROUGH THE SECRETARY, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI 7.. COMMISSIONER OP INCOME TAX (APPEALS), CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, ClVIL LlNES, RAIPUR, DlSTRICT RAIPUR (C.G.) ^. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2 (1), AAYKAR BHAWAN, ClVIL LlNES, RAIPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLEWRIT ORWRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORfiER OR ORDERS ^ fS^SS^. tf\"w 1&r1 'sga: a --ft.t?e -SS 3 'f^ r^ •^•^ hf^, sfw^g^ TW ^ ^SST •*ll<. LT)...•?.4../v.^a^ 2oi an^ni^t (TjpT.i^y) SIK^^lR-lich WJT^I^sb^ ^?nSRtrf?tTan^r SB: Hon. nAr.Justice Pritinker D Waker 15.05.2015: Shri Sumit Nema counsel for t Smt. Naushina Ali counsel for By assessment order da^ respondent No.3 for the assessms notice has been issued asking th^ Crore 85 Lakhs. According to the pe) pitched assessment has been madf respondent No.3. |ie petitioner. ^espondents 2 and 3. jed 30.3.2015 passed by ^nt year 2012-2013 demand petitioner to deposit Rs. 1 [itioner, an unreasonable high by the assessing officer i.e. Counsel for the petitioner| assessment order the petitioner ha) respondent No.2 vide Annexure operation of the demand notice is may take coercive steps against th^ disputed amount and the property 4^ attached. He submits that till the det may be directed not to take any| petitioner for recovery of disputet) counsel for the petitioner, in case a| petitioner by respondent No.3, at granted for seven days to approach the petitioner submits that instructioi|i yii^y ggmra^, •tiidM-f«iti?it'Sfeieals) andothers}. jubmits that the petitioner has fore respondent No.2 and Section 220 (6) before iflecovery order and she has ]the petitioner pending before ircive steps would be takeh that in case the order is B^nch {Ncjrthern T?Fra^ta ^vny^, v^.- FS/i-7/20i4--2,oo:ooo. ^-- ^^^,. .^