M/S THE KADAKAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,KASARAGOD V. ITO WARD 1 & TPS, KASARAGOD, KASARAGOD

ITA 679/COCH/2022

AI Insights

The case involves Kadakam Service Co-op. Bank Ltd., which appealed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, for the Assessment Year 2014-15. The primary issue was the denial of exemption under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the Assessing Officer, who argued that the bank was not a primary agricultural co-operative society as it provided credit facilities to nominal members. The Tribunal, referencing the Supreme Court's decision in Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. CIT, found that the inclusion of nominal members does not disqualify the society from the exemption and thus allowed the appeal.

• Counselvise Citation: [2024] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 23490 (ITAT-COCHIN)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 4 month(s) 16 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 30-10-2024
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Assessment Year: 2014-2015
• Appeal Filed On: 13-06-2022
• Other Referred Cases: Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. CIT [2021] 431 ITR 1 (SC), UP Cooperative Cane Unions' Federation Ltd. 11 SCC 287
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: LEENA LAL
• Assessee Lawyers: ARUN RAJ S.
• Keywords: Condonation of delay
• Section: 20

Judgement Text

" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN Before Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Accountant Member ITA No. 679/Coch/2022 (Assessment Year: 2014-15) Kadakam Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. P.O. Kadagam, Mulleria Kasargod 671453 [PAN: AABAT7767K] vs. The Income Tax Officer Ward -1, Kasargod (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: Shri Arun Raj S., Advocate Respondent by: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing: 28.10.2024 Date of Pronouncement: 30.10.2024 O R D E R This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 25.03.2022 for Assessment Year (AY) 2014-15. 2. At the outset, I find the appeal is time barred by limitation by 20 days before the Tribunal. The assessee filed a petition praying for condonation of delay on the ground that his counsel, who was dealing with the matter went abroad on 08.04.2022 and retuned only on 03.06.2022. On his return the matter was entrusted to the present counsel at Ernakulam on 06.06.2022 for filing appeal before the Tribunal. Therefore, there is no willful negligence or deliberate latches on the part of the 2 ITA No. 679/Coch/2022 Kadakam Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. assessee in not filing the appeal within the stipulated time limit. The assessee prayed to condone the delay of 20 days. 3. Having gone through the averments made in the condonation petition filed by the assessee and in the absence of any contrary material to disbelieve the contention put forth by the assessee, I am of the considered opinion that it is a fit case to condone the delay of 20 days in filing the appeal and proceed for adjudication of the appeal on merits. 4. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a primary co-operative society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act. The return of income for AY 2014-15 was filed on 10.02.2016 declaring Nil income after claiming exemption u/s. 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) . Against the said return of income, assessment was completed by the Assessing Officer (AO) vide order dated 29.12.2016. While doing so the AO had denied exemption u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act by holding that the assessee is not a primary agricultural co-operative society as it also provides credit facilities to nominal members who are classified as class C and class D members. 5. Being aggrieved an appeal was filed before the CIT(A) who vide the impugned order confirmed the action of the AO. 6. Being aggrieved the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal. The solitary issue that arises in both the appeals is where the lower authorities were justified in denying deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act solely on the ground that the assessee co-operative society also provided credit facilities to nominal members. The issue in the appeal is no more res integra, as it is settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. CIT [2021] 431 ITR 1 (SC), 3 ITA No. 679/Coch/2022 Kadakam Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. wherein after making a reference to its earlier judgement in the case of UP Cooperative Cane Unions’ Federation Ltd. 11 SCC 287 held that the expression “member” includes nominal members under the Kerala Cooperative Societies Act and therefore it was held that denial of exemption u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act is unjustified solely on the ground that the assessee society also provides loans to the nominal members. In the light of this the AO is directed to allow the deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act to the assessee. 7. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 30th October, 2024 Sd/- (Inturi Rama Rao) Accountant Member Cochin, Dated: 30th October, 2024 n.p. Copy to: 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. The Pr. CIT concerned 4. The Sr. DR, ITAT, Cochin 5. Guard File By Order Assistant Registrar ITAT, Cochin "