Hrushikesh Das, Bhubaneswar V. ITO, Ward-2(3), Bhubaneswar,

MA 14/CTK/2014

• Counselvise Citation: [2014] 124 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 2498 (ITAT-CUTTACK)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 month(s) 6 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Miscellaneous Application
• Pronouncement Date: 20-10-2014
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 14-07-2014
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

M.A . NO. 1 4/CTK/2014 (ARISING OUT OF I.T.A. NO. 1 66/ CTK ./20 1 3) ASSESSMENT YEAR: 20 09 - 20 1 0 PAGE 1 OF 2 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI S .V. MEHROTRA (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) , AND SHRI GEORGE MATHAN (JUDICIAL MEMBER) M.A . NO. 1 4/CTK/2014 (ARISING OUT OF I.T.A. NO. 1 66 / CTK / 20 1 3) ASSESSMENT YEAR : 20 09 - 20 1 0 SRI HRUSI KESH DAS, . .......... ......................... ..... .. ... APPLICANT MIG - 6, BRIT COLONY, LAXMI NAGAR, BHUBANESWAR - 751 006 PAN : A A YPD 9818 K ] - VS. - INCOME TAX OFFICER ,.......... .......... .......................... RESPONDENT WARD - 2(3), BHUBANESWAR APPEARANCES BY: NONE (WRITTEN SUBMISSION FILED , FOR THE APPLICANT SHRI S.C. MOHANTY , D.R. FOR THE DEPARTMENT DATE OF CONCLUDING THE HEARING : OCTOBER 1 7 , 2 01 4 DATE OF PRONOUNCING THE ORDER : OCTOBER 20 , 201 4 O R D E R PER GEORGE MATHAN : TH IS IS A MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE COORDINATE BENCH OF THIS TRIBUNAL IN ITA NO. 166/CTK/2013 DATED 13.06.2013 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009 - 10. 2 . NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AND SHRI S.C. MOHANTY , D.R . , REPRESENTED ON BEHALF OF THE REVENUE . 3 . IT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED IN THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION THAT THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL SUFFERS FROM A MISTAKE IN SO FAR AS THE PERMANENT ACCOUNT N UMBER R EFERRED TO IS ERRONEOUS. M.A . NO. 1 4/CTK/2014 (ARISING OUT OF I.T.A. NO. 1 66/ CTK ./20 1 3) ASSESSMENT YEAR: 20 09 - 20 1 0 PAGE 2 OF 2 4. IN REPLY, LD. D.R. ADMITTE D THAT PAN OF ASSESSEE WAS WRONGLY RECORDED. 5. WE HAVE CONSIDERED THIS SUBMISSION. WE HAVE ALSO VERIFIED THE PAN OF ASSESSEE, WHICH WAS IN THE ASSESSMENT ORDER AND IN THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL. IT IS NOTICED THAT THE PAN RECORDED IN THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL IS ERRONEOUS AND THE SAME STANDS RECTIFIED AND THE PAN SHALL NOW READ AS AAYPD 9818 K. 6. IN THE RESULT, THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FILED BY THE ASSESSEE STANDS ALLOWED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 20 TH OCTOBER , 2014. SD/ - SD/ - S .V. ME HROTRA GEORGE MATHAN ( ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) ( JUDICIAL MEMBER) KOLKATA, THE 20 TH D AY OF OCTO BER , 201 4 COPIES TO : (1) THE ASSESSEE / APPLICANT (2) THE DEPARTMENT (3) COMMISSIONER OF INCOME - TAX (APPEALS) (4 ) COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( 5 ) THE DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE ( 6 ) GUARD FILE BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK B ENCH, CUTTACK LA HA/SR. P.S.