, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL D BENCH, CHENNAI ... , ! '#,% &' BEFORE SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI SANJAY ARORA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (( / M.P. NO.141/MDS/2017 (IN I.T.A. NO.69/MDS/2017) ) *) / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2011-12 SHRI G. SUDHAKAR, M/S SUDHAKAR AGENCIES, NO.9/24, KANAN FLOUR MILL STREET, STUART PET, ARAKKONAM, VELLORE 631 001. PAN : BMKPS 1043 N V. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(3), VELLORE. (,-) /PETITIONER) (,.-// RESPONDENT) ,-) 1 2 /PETITIONER BY : NONE ,.-/ 1 2 / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI ASISH TRIPATHY, JCIT 3 1 4% / DATE OF HEARING : 14.07.2017 5'* 1 4% / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 14.07.2017 / O R D E R PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER: THIS ASSESSEE HAS FILED THE PRESENT MISCELLANEOUS PETITION PRAYING FOR RECALL OF THE ORDER OF THIS TRIBUNAL DA TED 28.02.2017. 2. NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SERVED ON THE ASSESSEE BY RPAD. THE REGISTRY HAS PLACED ON RECORD THE POSTAL ACKNOW LEDGEMENT AS 2 M.P. NO.141/MDS/17 PROOF OF SERVICE OF NOTICE ON THE ASSESSEE. EVEN A FTER RECEIPT OF NOTICE, NO ONE APPEARED FOR THE ASSESSEE WHEN THE M ISCELLANEOUS PETITION WAS TAKEN UP FOR HEARING. 3. THERE MAY BE VARIOUS REASONS FOR THE ASSESSEE FO R NOT APPEARING BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL WHEN THE MISCELLANEO US PETITION WAS TAKEN UP FOR HEARING. ONE OF THE REASONS, PRESUMAB LY, THE ASSESSEE MAY NOT BE INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING HIS M ISCELLANEOUS PETITION. WHATEVER MAY BE THE REASON, BY KEEPING T HE PROVISO TO RULE 24 OF INCOME TAX (APPELLATE TRIBUNAL) RULES, 1 963, IN MIND, THE MISCELLANEOUS PETITION FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION. 4. WITH THE ABOVE OBSERVATION, THE MISCELLANEOUS PE TITION OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 14 TH JULY, 2017 AT CHENNAI. SD/- SD/- ( ! '# ) ( ... ) (SANJAY ARORA) (N.R.S. GANESAN) % / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER /JUDICIAL MEMBER /CHENNAI, 7 /DATED, THE 14 TH JULY, 2017. KRI. 3 M.P. NO.141/MDS/17 1 ,48( 9(*4 /COPY TO: 1. ,-) / PETITIONER 2. ,.-/ /RESPONDENT 3. 3 :4 () /CIT(A) 4. 3 :4 /CIT 5. (; ,4 /DR 6. ) < /GF.