PAGE 1 OF 2 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM BEFORE: SHRI SUNIL KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI BR BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER M.A. NOS. 153 & 154/VIZAG/2010 (ARISING OUT OF ITA NOS.304 & 305/VIZAG/2010) ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2006-07 SMT. K.N. ANURADHA VISAKHAPATNAM VS. ITO WARD-3(2) VISAKHAPATNAM (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN NO.ADTPN 0506 C APPELLANT BY: SHRI G.V.N. HARI, CA RESPONDENT BY: SHRI J. SIRI KUMAR, DR ORDER PER SHRI B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER : BY THIS PETITION THE ASSESSEE SEEKS RECALL OF ORDE R DATED 2ND AUGUST, 2010 PASSED BY THIS BENCH ON THE GROUND THAT THE NO N APPEARANCE ON THE DATE FIXED FOR HEARING WAS ON ACCOUNT OF SUFFICIENT CAUSE. 2. LD COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT DUE T O ILL-HEALTH OF THE SPOUSE OF THE ASSESSEE, THE PETITIONER-APPELLANT CO ULD NOT FOLLOW UP THE APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, HE SUBMITTED THAT THE NON-APPE ARANCE ON THE DATE OF HEARING WAS FOR SUFFICIENT CAUSE AND PRAYED FOR REC ALL OF THE ORDER. WE ALSO HEARD THE LD. DR IN THIS REGARD. 3. HAVING REGARD TO THE REASONS GIVEN BY THE ASSESS EE AND IN EXERCISE OF POWERS VESTED IN US UNDER RULE 24 AND 25 OF THE APP ELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES, WE RECALL THE ORDER REFERRED SUPRA. PAGE 2 OF 2 4. THE MISCELLANEOUS PETITION IS ACCORDINGLY ALLOWE D AND THE REGISTRY IS DIRECTED TO POST THE APPEAL ON 2ND DECEMBER, 2010. SINCE THE DATE OF HEARING IS ANNOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT IN THE PRESE NCE OF THE PARTIES, BOTH THE PARTIES MAY NOTE THAT FORMAL NOTICE OF HEARING WILL NOT BE SENT TO THEM. PRONOUNCED ACCORDINGLY ON 20 TH OCTOBER, 2010. SD/- SD/- (SUNIL KUMAR YADAV) (B R BASKARAN) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER PVV/SPS VISAKHAPATNAM DATE: 20-10-2010 COPY TO 1 SMT. K. N. ANURADHA, D.NO.50-25-4 SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM 500013 2 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(2) VISAKHAPATNAM 3 THE CIT (A) VISAKHAPATNAM, 4 CIT-1, VISAKHAPATNAM 5 THE DR, ITAT, VISAKHAPATNAM. 6 GUARD FILE. BY ORDER SENIOR PRIVATE SECRETARY INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL VISAKHAPATNAM