IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW SMC BENCH, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER M. A. NO.16/LKW/2013 [ARISING OUT OF ITA NO. 129/LKW/2013] ASSESSMENT YEAR:2006-07 KM. RISHIKA MEHROTRA 701, NAVSHEEL SADAN, P.B. ROAD KANPUR V. ITO 3(3) KANPUR PAN:AIQPM4222R (APPLICANT) (RESPONDENT) A PP LICANT B Y :NONE RESPONDENT BY: SHRI. ALOK MITRA, D.R. DATE OF HEARING: 23.08.2013 DATE OF P RONOUNCEMENT: 26.08.2013 O R D E R THIS MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION IS PREFERRED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED 31.5. 2013 IN ITA NO. 129/LKW/2013 WITH THE SUBMISSI ON THAT IN PARA 7 AT PAGE 4 OF THE ORDER THE TRIBUNAL HAS INADVE RTENTLY MENTIONED THE FI GURE OF COMMISSION AT ` 2,25,225 WHEREAS THE CORR ECT FIGURE AS PER THE ORDERS OF THE LOWER AUTHORITIES IS ` 2,52,225. THEREFORE, THE SAME MAY BE CORR ECTED AS IT IS A MISTAKE APPARENT IN THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL. 2. THE LD. D.R. DID NOT OPPOSE THE SAME. 3. HAVING CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE ORDE RS OF THE LOWER AUTHORITIES, WE FIND THAT THE TRIBUNAL HA S INADVERTENTLY MENTIONED THE FIGURE OF COMMISSION AT ` 2,25,225 IN PLACE ` 2,52,225. SINCE THERE IS AN APPARENT MISTAKE IN THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED 31.5.2013, I MODIFY THE SAME AND SUBSTITUTE :-2-: THE FIGURE OF ` 2,52,225/- IN PLACE OF ` 2,25,225 IN PARA 7 AT PAGE 4 OF THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL. 4. ACCORDINGLY, THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 26.8.2013. SD/- [SUNIL KUMAR YADAV] JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED:26.8.2013 JJ:2308 COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPLICANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT(A) 4. CIT 5. DR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR