IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD B BENCH AHMEDABAD BEFORE, SHRI S. S. GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER M.A. NOS. 168 TO 170/AHD/2014 (IN IT(SS)A NO S.423 TO 425/AHD/2012) (ASSESSMENT YEARS:2007-08 TO 2009-10) ACIT, CENT. CIRCLE 1(1), AHMEDABAD 380014 APPELLANT VS. MADANLAL L. CHANDAK (SHAH) 3248, SHANTINAGAR SOCIETY, MODASA ROAD, DIST. SABARKANTHA, TALOD - 382215 RESPONDENT/APPLICANT PAN: AABCM0644E /BY REVENUE : SHRI JAMES KURIAN, SR. D.R. /BY ASSESSEE : NONE /DATE OF HEARING : 06.01.2017 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 17.01.2017 ORDER PER S. S. GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER THESE THREE ASSESSEES MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS F ILED U/S.254(2) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961; IN SHORT THE ACT SEEK TO RECALL TRIBUNALS M.A. NOS. 168 TO 170/AHD/2014 (ACIT VS. MADANLAL L. CHANDAK (SHAH)) A.YS. 2007-08 TO 2009-10 - 2 - COMMON ORDER DATED 02.05.2014 DISMISSING REVENUES APPEAL AND PARTLY ACCEPTING ASSESSEES CROSS OBJECTIONS FILED THEREIN . . 2. CASE CALLED TWICE. NONE APPEARS AT ASSESSEES B EHEST DESPITE SERVICE OF RPAD NOTICE DATED 11.11.2016. WE INFER IN THESE FA CTS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THESE MISCELLANEOUS A PPLICATIONS. WE THUS QUOTE THE DECISION OF THE MULTIPLAN (INDIA) (P) LTD ., (38 ITD 320) AND DISMISS THESE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS FILED BY ASSESSEE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 3. AS A RESULT, THESE THREE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATI ONS FILED BY ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION. [PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THIS THE 17 TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2017.] SD/- SD/- ( AMARJIT SINGH ) (S. S. GODARA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD: DATED 17/01/2017 TRUE COPY S.K.SINHA / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO:- / REVENUE 2 / ASSESSEE ! / CONCERNED CIT 4 !- / CIT (A) ( )*+ ,--. . /0 / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 1 +23 / GUARD FILE. BY ORDER / . // . /0