IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH, CHENNAI BEFORE SHRI ABRAHAM P. GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER .. M.P. NO. 169/MDS/2011 (IN I.T.A. NO. 514/MDS/2010) ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2000-01 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT, CHENNAI 600 101. (PETITIONER) V. M/S NEYVELI LIGNITE CORPORATION LTD., CORPORATE OFFICE, P.O. NEYVELI 607 801. PAN : AAACN1121C (RESPONDENT) PETITIONER BY : SHRI SANJAY DESHMUKH, SR. D.R. RESPONDENT BY : SHRI SAROJK UMAR PARIDA, ADVOCATE DATE OF HEARING : 23.09.2011 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 23.09.2011 O R D E R PER ABRAHAM P. GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER : IN THIS MISCELLANEOUS PETITION FILED BY THE REVENU E, IT SEEKS RECALL OF ORDER DATED 23 RD JUNE, 2010 OF THIS TRIBUNAL IN I.T.A. NO. 514/MDS/2010. 2. THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE WAS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF CLEARANCE FROM COMMITTEE ON DISPUTES. NOW AS PER T HE DECISION OF M.P. NO. 169/MDS/11 2 HON'BLE APEX COURT IN THE CASE OF ELECTRONICS CORPO RATION OF INDIA LTD. V. UNION OF INDIA (322 ITR 58), APPROVAL OF CO MMITTEE ON DISPUTES IS NOT REQUIRED FOR PURSUING APPEAL MATTER S BEFORE APPELLATE AUTHORITIES. THIS IS ALSO NOT A CASE WHERE COMMITT EE ON DISPUTES HAD DENIED APPROVAL TO THE REVENUE TO PURSUE THE MA TTER BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL. HENCE, WE ARE OF THE OPINION THAT THE OR DER OF THIS TRIBUNAL HAS TO BE RECALLED AND FIXED FOR HEARING AFRESH. T HEREFORE, THE APPEAL IS RE-FIXED AND DATE OF HEARING OF THE APPEAL WILL BE 5.10.11. THE DATE BEING ANNOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT, THERE WILL BE NO FURTHER NOTICE TO THE PARTIES. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE MISCELLANEOUS PETITION FILED BY THE REVENUE STANDS ALLOWED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT AFTER CONCLUSION OF HEARING ON THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2011. SD/- SD/- (GEORGE MATHAN) (ABRAHAM P. GEORGE) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER CHENNAI, DATED THE 23 RD SEPTEMBER, 2011. KRI. COPY TO: PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/CIT(A)/CIT/D.R./GUAR D FILE