T.L.Prasanth, CHENNAI V. ITO, CHENNAI

MA 172/CHNY/2015

• Counselvise Citation: [2015] 124 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3739 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 month(s) 4 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Miscellaneous Application
• Pronouncement Date: 11-12-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Next Hearing Date: 11-12-2015
• Assessment Year: 2004-2005
• Appeal Filed On: 06-08-2015
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: P RADHAKRISHNAN
• Assessee Lawyers: M P SENTHIL KUMAR

Judgement Text

, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL D BENCH, CHENNAI ... , . !'# ! , % !& BEFORE SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER M.P. NO.172/MDS/2015 (IN I.T.A. NO.1321/MDS/2013) ' (' / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2004-05 SHRI T.L. PRASANTH, # 1, RUTLAND GATE 2 ND STREET, CHENNAI - 600 006. PAN : AAGPP 6475 N V. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, MEDIA WARD I, CHENNAI. (*+' /PETITIONER) (*,+-/ RESPONDENT) M.P. NO.173/MDS/2015 (IN I.T.A. NO.1322/MDS/2013) ' (' / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2004-05 SHRI S. THIAGARAJAN, # 1, RUTLAND GATE 2 ND STREET, CHENNAI - 600 006. PAN : ABWPT 2540 F V. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, MEDIA WARD I, CHENNAI. (*+' /PETITIONER) (*,+-/ RESPONDENT) M.P. NO.171/MDS/2015 (IN I.T.A. NO.1320/MDS/2013) ' (' / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2004-05 SMT. SHANTHI THIAGARAJAN, # 1, RUTLAND GATE 2 ND STREET, CHENNAI - 600 006. PAN : ABHPS 5927 J V. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, MEDIA WARD I, CHENNAI. (*+' /PETITIONER) (*,+-/ RESPONDENT) 2 M.P. NOS.171 TO 174/MDS/15 M.P. NO.174/MDS/2015 (IN I.T.A. NO.1323/MDS/2013) ' (' / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2004-05 MS. T. PREETHI, # 1, RUTLAND GATE 2 ND STREET, CHENNAI - 600 006. PAN : AAGPP 6474 P V. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, MEDIA WARD I, CHENNAI. (*+' /PETITIONER) (*,+-/ RESPONDENT) *+' / 0 /PETITIONERS BY : SH. M.P. SENTHILKUMAR, ADVO CATE *,+- / 0 / RESPONDENT BY : SH. P. RADHAKRISHNAN, JCIT 1 / 2% / DATE OF HEARING : 11.12.2015 3'( / 2% / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 11.12.2015 / O R D E R PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER: ALL THESE MISCELLANEOUS PETITIONS ARE FILED BY TH E ASSESSEES ON THE GROUND THAT THERE WAS ERROR IN THE ORDER OF THIS TRIBUNAL. 2. WHEN THESE MISCELLANEOUS PETITIONS WERE TAKEN UP FOR HEARING, THE ASSESSEES FILED APPLICATIONS SEEKING P ERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE MISCELLANEOUS PETITIONS. THE LD. DEPA RTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE HAD NO OBJECTION TO DISMISS THE MISC ELLANEOUS PETITIONS AS WITHDRAWN. 3. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, ALL THE MISCELLANEOUS PETI TIONS ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 3 M.P. NOS.171 TO 174/MDS/15 ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 11 TH DECEMBER, 2015 AT CHENNAI. SD/- SD/- (. !'# ! ) ( ... ) (A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY) (N.R.S. GANESAN) % / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER /JUDICIAL MEMBER /CHENNAI, 5 /DATED, THE 11 TH DECEMBER, 2015. KRI. / *267 87(2 /COPY TO: 1. *+' / PETITIONER 2. *,+- /RESPONDENT 3. 1 92 () /CIT(A) 4. 1 92 /CIT 5. 7: *2 /DR 6. ' ; /GF.