IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES D, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R.S.SYAL, AM AN D SHRI N.V.VASUDEVAN, JM M.A.NO.196/MUM/2011 (ARISING OUT OF ITA NO.1297/MU M/2005 : ASST.YEAR 2001-2002) SHRI D.B.VASWANI 121 MAKER CHAMBER VI NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI 400 020. PA NO.AAEPV1833E. VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD12(3)(2) MUMBAI. (APPLICANT) (RESPONDENT) APPLICANT BY : SHRI VIMAL PUNMIYA RESPONDENT BY : SHRI G.P.TRIVEDI O R D E R PER R.S.SYAL, AM : THIS MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION U/S. 254(2) OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 HAS BEEN MOVED BY THE ASSESSEE PRAY ING FOR THE RECALLING OF THE EX PARTE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED 4 TH DECEMBER, 2007 IN ITA NO. 1297/MUM/2005. THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE STATED THAT THE TRIBUNAL HAS DISMISSED THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. THE LEAR NED COUNSEL FURTHER CONTENDED THAT THE ASSESSEE WAS PREVENTED BY REASO NABLE CAUSE FOR NON APPEARANCE ON THE DATE OF HEARING. IN SUPPORT OF HIS SUBMISSION , AN AFFIDAVIT DATED 25.03.2011 WAS FILED. THE LEARNED D.R. DID NOT RAISE ANY SERIOUS OBJECTION TO IT. 2. WE HAVE HEARD THE RIVA L PARTIES AND PERUSED THE RE LEVANT MATERIAL ON RECORD. WE ARE SATISFIED WITH THE REASONS FOR THE ABSENCE OF THE ASSESSEE AT THE TIME WHEN THE APPEAL WAS TAKEN UP FOR HEARING BY THE TRIBUNAL. WE, THEREFORE, RECALL THE IMPUGNED ORDER AND DIRECT THE REGISTRY TO FIX THIS CA SE FOR HEARING ON 12.07.2011. NO SEPARATE NOTICE NEED BE SENT TO THE ASSESSEE AS THE PRONOUNCEMENT TO THIS EFFECT WAS MADE IN THE OPEN COURT AND THE LEARNED A.R. HAS WAIVED HIS RIGHT TO SEPARATE NOTICE. MA NO.196/MUM/2011 SHRI D.B.VASWANI. 2 3. IN THE RESULT, THE MISCELLA NEOUS APPLICATION IS ALLOWED. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON THIS 24 TH DAY OF JUNE, 2011. SD/- SD/- (N.V.VASUDEVAN) (R.S.SYAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER A CCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI : 24 TH JUNE, 2011. DEVDAS* COPY TO : 1. THE APPLICANT. 2. THE RESPONDENT. 3. THE CIT CONCERNED 4. THE CIT(A) XII, MUMBAI. 5. THE DR/ITAT, MUMBAI. 6. GUARD FILE. TRUE COPY. BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, ITAT, MUMBAI.