Rakshit Shetty, Pondicherry V. ACIT, Pondicherry

MA 211/CHNY/2015

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 124 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 4031 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 month(s) 13 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Miscellaneous Application
• Pronouncement Date: 05-02-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2002-2003
• Appeal Filed On: 23-10-2015
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: DR B NISCHAL

Judgement Text

, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , A B ENCH, CHENNAI . . . , . , % BEFORE SHRI N.R.S.GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI A.MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER M.P.NOS.210 TO 214/MDS/2015 ( ./ IN I.T.A.NO.1508 TO 1512/MDS/2012 ( / ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2001-02 TO 2003-04, 2005-06 & 2006-07 ) MR. RAKSHIT SHETTY, PROP: M/S. PRAKSHADENT, C-86/94, PIPDIC INDUSTRIAL AREA, METTUPALAYAM, PUDUCHERRY. VS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-I PUDUCHERRY PAN:ALVPS5573L (PETITIONER) ( /RESPONDENT) APPLICANT BY : NONE /RESPONDENT BY : DR.B.NISCHAL, JCIT /DATE OF HEARING : 5 TH FEBRUARY, 2016 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 5 TH FEBRUARY, 2016 / O R D E R PER A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, AM: THESE MISCELLANEOUS PETITIONS ARE FILED BY THE ASSESSEE PRAYING FOR RECALL OF THE ORDER OF THE TRI BUNAL IN ITA NOS.1508 TO 1512/MDS/2012 DATED 08.10.2012 PASSED EX- PARTE FOR NON-APPEARANCE. 2. IN THE MISCELLANEOUS PETITION FILED BY THE ASSES SEE , IT IS STATED THAT SINCE THE NOTICE OF HEARING WAS MISPLAC ED, THE LEARNED AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE COULD NOT APPEAR BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL ON THE EARLIER OCCASION I.E. 08.10.20 12. THEREFORE, IT IS PRAYED THAT ONE MORE OPPORTUNITY M AY BE 2 MP NOS.210 TO 214/MDS/2015 GIVEN TO THE ASSESSEE TO PURSUE THE APPEALS BY RECA LLING THE EX-PARTE ORDER. 3. HOWEVER, AT THE TIME OF HEARING THE MISCELLANEOU S PETITIONS, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSE E. THE NOTICE OF HEARING SENT TO THE ASSESSEE BY REGISTERE D POST WAS RETURNED UNSERVED WITH A POSTAL REMARK LEFT. THEREFORE, WE ARE OF THE CONSIDERED OPINION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE MISCELLANEOUS PETITIO NS FILED BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL. HENCE, WE DISMISS THESE MISCE LLANEOUS PETITIONS FOR NON-PROSECUTION. 4. IN THE RESULT, ALL THE FIVE MISCELLANEOUS PETIT IONS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THE 5 TH FEBRUARY, 2016 SD/- SD/- ( . . . ) ( . ) (N.R.S.GANESAN) ( A.MOHAN A LANKAMONY ) # % / JUDICIAL MEMBER % / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER # /CHENNAI, ( /DATED THE 5 TH FEBRUARY, 2016 SOMU *+ ,+ /COPY TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. - () /CIT(A) 4. - /CIT 5. + 1 /DR 6. /GF .