IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH ‘I-1’ : NEW DELHI) BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDENT, SHRI G.S. PANNU and SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER MA NO.221/DEL/2021 (in SA No.229/Del/2021) (in ITA No.1560/Del./2021) (ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2017-18) Grohe India Pvt. Ltd., vs. DCIT, Circle 2 (1), 10 th Floor, Banni, Address One, New Delhi. Golf Course Road, Sector 56, Gurgaon. (PAN : AACCG6062B) (APPLICANT) (RESPONDENT) APPLICANT/ASSESSEE BY : Shri K.M. Gupta, Advocate REVENUE BY : Shri Vipul Kashyap, Senior DR Date of Hearing : 28.01.2022 Date of Order : 28.01.2022 O R D E R PER AMIT SHUKLA, JM In the aforesaid misc. Application, the applicant/assessee had stated that the Tribunal while hearing the stay application had erroneously mentioned in the stay order dated 12.011.2021 that it is not a fit case for stay of demand albeit has granted early hearing in this matter. He pointed out that in case, in open court, the Bench had observed that no order is to be passed on stay application and that 2 MA No.221/Del/2021 could be listed along with appeal and the date fixed for hearing was 07.02.2022. From the perusal of our logbook, we find that the contention of the ld. Counsel for the applicant is correct, therefore, we rectify the stay application and held that the stay application is not rejected and it will be fixed along with the appeal on 07.02.2022. Accordingly, the misc. application is allowed. SD/- SD/- (G.S. PANNU) (AMIT SHUKLA) PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 28.01.2022 TS Copy forwarded to: 1.Appellant 2.Respondent 3.CIT 4.CIT(A). 5.CIT(ITAT), New Delhi. AR, ITAT NEW DELHI. 3 MA No.221/Del/2021