ITO 12(1)(1), V. BALAJI INFOTECH SERVICES,

MA 252/MUM/2012

• Counselvise Citation: [2012] 123 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 9471 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 7 month(s) 4 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Miscellaneous Application
• Pronouncement Date: 30-11-2012
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2005-2006
• Appeal Filed On: 25-04-2012
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: SAMEER G DALAL

Judgement Text

, , , , , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES B, MUMBAI .. , ! '# $% , & !, ' BEFORE SHRI R.S.SYAL, AM AND SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JM (( !) ./ MA NO.252/MUM/2012 ( +,# - / ARISING OUT OF ITA NO.5066/MUM/2010) ( &) . &) . &) . &) . / / / / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2005-2006) THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 12(1)(1) MUMBAI. M/S.BALAJI INFOTECH SERVICES 1 GROUND FLOOR, VARDHMAN CHAMBERS 17 CAWASJI PATEL STREET, FORT MUMBAI 400 001. PAN : AACFB9176E. ( ! / // / APPLICANT) ) ) ) ) / VS. ( /012/ RESPONDENT) ! 3 33 3 4 4 4 4 / APPLICANT BY : SHRI MOHIT JAIN /012 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI SAMEER G.DALAL ) 3 # / / / / DATE OF HEARING : 30.11.2012 56. 3 # / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : .30.11. 2012 !$ !$ !$ !$ / / / / O R D E R PER R.S.SYAL, AM : THIS MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION U/S.254(2) OF THE IN COME-TAX ACT, 1961 HAS BEEN MOVED BY THE REVENUE PRAYING FOR THE RECTIFICATION OF THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED 28 .12.2011 IN ITA NO.5066/MUM/2010. 2. THE LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE CONTENDE D THAT THERE HAS CREPT A TYPOGRAPHICAL MISTAKE IN PARA 6 OF THE IMPUGNED ORDER. VIDE LAST LINE THE AMOUNT OF DELETION OF ADDITION H AS BEEN MENTIONED AT ` 20 LAKH AS AGAINST THE CORRECT AMOUNT OF ADDITION O F ` 10 LAKH. THE MA NO.252/MUM/2012 M/S.BALAJI INFOTECH SERVICES. 2 LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE DID NOT DISPUTE TH IS FACT. IT WAS FAIRLY ADMITTED THAT THE AMOUNT OF ADDITION, IN FACT, WAS WRONGLY MENTIONED AS ` 20 LAKHS. IN SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES, WE RECTIFY THE MIS TAKE AND DIRECT TO READ THE AMOUNT OF DELETION OF ADDITION AS ` 10 LAKHS IN PARA NO. 6 OF THE IMPUGNED ORDER. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION IS ALLOWED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THIS 30 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2012. !$ 3 56. 7!)8 6 3 9 SD/- SD/- (AMIT SHUKLA) (R.S.SYAL) & ! & ! & ! & ! / JUDICIAL MEMBER ! ! ! ! / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI ; 7!) DATED : 30 TH NOVEMBER, 2012. DEVDAS* !$ 3 /&#'( :(.# !$ 3 /&#'( :(.# !$ 3 /&#'( :(.# !$ 3 /&#'( :(.#/ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. ! / THE APPLICANT. 2. /012 / THE RESPONDENT. 3. ; () / THE CIT(A)-23, MUMBAI. 4. ; / CIT 5. (>9 /&#&) , , / DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. 9? @ / GUARD FILE. !$) !$) !$) !$) / BY ORDER, 0(# /&# //TRUE COPY// + + + +/ // /A B A B A B A B ( DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) , , , , / ITAT, MUMBAI