IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH, B ENGALURU BEFORE S HRI SUNIL KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MISC.PETN.NO.254/BANG/2018 (IN I TA NO. 1 195 / BANG/2 0 1 8 ) (ASSESSMENT YEAR: 201 4 - 15 ) SHRI RAVINDAR S.SH ETTY, FLAT NO.101, KUMARA ASHRAYA, NO.38, CURLEY STREET, RICHMOND TOWN, BENGALURU - 560025 . PAN: ADOPS6717J VS. PETITIONER INCOME - TAX OFFICER, WARD 3 ( 1 )( 4 ) , BENGALURU. RESPONDENT PETITIONER BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SMT.PADMAMEENAKS HI, JCIT(DR) DATE OF HEARING : 27 /0 7 /2018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 01/ /0 8 /2018 O R D E R PER I NTURI RAMA RAO, AM : THIS IS AN APPLICATION FILED BY THE ASSESSEE SEEKING RECALL OF THE TRIBUNAL ORDER DATED 4 TH JUNE 2018 IN ITA NO.1195/BANG/2018. 2. WHEN THE MISC. PETITION WAS CALLED UP FOR HEARING, NOBODY APPEARED FOR ASSESSEE AND THERE WAS NO REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT ALSO DESPITE SERVICE OF NOTICE ON THE ASSESSEE. IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, WE ARE OF THE OPINION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PRO SECUTING ITS CASE. WE DISMISS THE MISC. PETN. FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE HON BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR V. CWT (1997) 223 ITR 480 AND THE DECISION OF DELHI BENCH OF THE ITAT IN CIT V. MULTIPLAN INDIA P .LTD., (1991) 38 ITD 320 FOR NON - PROSECUTION. MP NO . 254 /BANG/20 18 PAGE 2 OF 2 3. IN THE RESULT, THE MISC ELLANEOUS PETITION FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 1 ST AUGUST, 2018 SD/ - SD/ - (SUNIL KUMAR YADAV) (INTURI RAMA RAO) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER PLACE : BENGALURU. D A T E D : 01 /0 8 /2018 SRINIVASULU, SPS COPY TO : 1 PETITIONER 2 RESPONDENT 3 CIT(A) 4 CIT 5 DR, ITAT, BANGALORE. 6 GUARD FILE BY ORDER SENIOR PRIVATE SECRETARY INCOME - TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE