Dr. Madan Mohan Reddy , CHENNAI V. ACIT Central Circle 3(1), CHENNAI

MA 262/CHNY/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2019] 112 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1845 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 month(s) 11 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Miscellaneous Application
• Pronouncement Date: 05-12-2019
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Assessment Year: 2014-2015
• Appeal Filed On: 25-10-2019
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL D BENCH, CHENNAI . . . , , BEFORE SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NOS. 258 TO 264/CHNY/2019 [ IN I.T.A. NOS. 2707 TO 2713/CHNY/2018] ( [ [ / ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2010-11 TO 2016-17) DR.MADAN MOHAN REDDY, NO.43, Q-BLOCK, 17 TH STREET, ANNANAGAR (WEST), CHENNAI 600 040. PAN: AGQPM 8435K V. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(1), CHENNAI 34. ( / APPLICANT) ( /RESPONDENT) / APPLICANT BY : SHRI I. DINESH, ADVOCATE /RESPONDENT BY : SHRI AR.V. SREENIVASAN, JCIT /DATE OF HEARING : 29.11.2019 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 05.12.2019 / O R D E R PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER : THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED THE MISCELLANEOUS PETITIONS ON THE GROUND THAT THERE IS AN ERROR IN THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL IN ITA NOS.2707 TO 2713/CHNY/2018 DATED 03.09.2019. 2 MA NOS.258 TO 264/CHNY/2019 2. SHRI I. DINESH, THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT THE ASSESSEE WAS REPRESENTED BY SHRI G. BASKAR, ADVOCATE IN THE APPEAL PROCEEDINGS. SHRI G. BASKAR ONLY FILED VAKALATH BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL. HOWEVER IN THE TRIBUNAL ORDER, IT WAS STATED, AS IF THE ASSESSEE WAS REPRESENTED BY SHRI N. ARJUN RAJ, CA FOR SHRI S. SRIDHAR, ADVOCATE. THIS IS A MISTAKE APPARENT ON THE FACE OF THE RECORD. THEREFORE, IT NEEDS TO BE RECTIFIED. 3. WE HEARD SHRI AR.V. SREENIVASAN, THE LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE ALSO. THE LD.DR SUBMITTED THAT THE ASSESSEE SEEKS TO RECTIFY THE NAME OF THE COUNSEL. THEREFORE, HE MAY NOT HAVE ANY OBJECTION TO RECTIFY THE ORDER AS PRAYED FOR. 4. HAVING HEARD THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE AND THE LD.DR, THIS TRIBUNAL IS OF THE CONSIDERED OPINION THAT SHRI G.BASKAR FILED THE VAKALATH BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL. THEREFORE BY OVERSIGHT INSPITE OF REFERRING SHRI G. BASKAR REPRESENTING THE RESPONDENT BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL, IT WAS REFERRED AS SHRI N. ARJUN RAJ, CA FOR SHRI S. SRIDHAR, ADVOCATE. THIS IS THE ONLY MISTAKE WHICH IS APPARENT ON THE FACE OF THE RECORD. THEREFORE THE SAME NEEDS TO BE 3 MA NOS.258 TO 264/CHNY/2019 RECTIFIED. ACCORDINGLY THE ORDER OF THIS TRIBUNAL DATED 03.09.2019 IS RECTIFIED AS FOLLOWS. THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE DELETED IN THE FIRST PAGE OF THE ORDER SHRI N. ARJUN RAJ, CA FOR SHRI S. SRIDHAR, ADVOCATE INSTEAD THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE INSERTED SHRI G. BASKAR, ADVOCATE. THE ORDER OF THIS TRIBUNAL DATED 03.09.2019 IS RECTIFIED ACCORDINGLY. THE OTHER PART OF THE ORDER SHALL REMAIN THE SAME. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE MISCELLANEOUS PETITIONS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE ARE ALLOWED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 5 TH DECEMBER, 2019 AT CHENNAI. SD/- SD/- ( ) (INTURI RAMA RAO) /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ( . . . ) (N.R.S. GANESAN) /JUDICIAL MEMBER /CHENNAI, /DATED, THE 5 TH DECEMBER, 2019 RSR . /COPY TO: 1. / APPLICANT 2. / RESPONDENT 3. ( ) /CIT(A) 4. /CIT 5. /DR 6. [ /GF.