Late Nathmal Bhuwalka, Rep. by Executor Sri K.K. Bajoria, Kolkata V. ITO, Ward - 33(1), Kolkata, Kolkata

MA 27/KOL/2011

• Counselvise Citation: [2014] 124 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1494 (ITAT-KOLKATA)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 9 month(s) 13 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Miscellaneous Application
• Pronouncement Date: 17-01-2014
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: C
• Assessment Year: 2005-2006
• Appeal Filed On: 04-04-2011
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: D S DAMLE
• Assessee Lawyers: A S MONDAL SRDR
• Keywords: Tax effect

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH C KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ABRAHAM P GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ( MISC. APPLICATION ) NO.27/KOL/2011 (A/O ITA NO.48/KOL/2011) ASSESSMENT YEAR :2004-05 DCIT, CIRCLE-2, KOLKATA V/S . M/S MACMET INIDIA LTD., KOLKATA [ PAN NO.AACCM 0804 B ] (ORIGINAL APPELLANT) (ORIGINAL RESPONDENT) / APPELLANT .. / RESPONDENT) /BY APPELLANT SHRI A.S.MONDAL, SR-DR /BY RESPONDENT SHRI D.S.DAMLE, AR /DATE OF HEARING 17-01-2014 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 17-01-2014 / // / O R D E R PER MAHAVIR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER:- BY WAY OF THIS MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION THE REVENU E HAS REQUESTED FOR RECALLING OF THE ORDER OF ITAT IN ITA NO.48/KOL /2011 DATED 14-07-2011. 2. AT THE OUTSET, LD. SR-DR DREW OUR ATTENTION TO T HIS MA AND STATED THAT THE TAX EFFECT IS MORE THAN RS.3 LAKHS. THE ISSUE R AISED IN THE PETITION READS AS UNDER:- IT IS APPARENT FROM PARA-3 OF THE ORDER OF ITAT TH AT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE LOSS RETURNED AND LOSS ASSESSED HAS BEE N TAKEN AS THE BASIS FOR CALCULATION OF TAX EFFECT, WHICH IS INCOR RECT. THE TAX EFFECT SHOULD HAVE BEEN CALCULATED ON THE BASIS OF DIFFERE NCE BETWEEN THE LOSS ASSESSED AND LOSS AS PER CIT(A)S ORDER BECAUSE THE DEPTT. WAS IN APPEALS AGAINST THE CIT(A)S ORDERS. THE ACTUAL POTENTIAL TAX EFFECT FOR THE AYR. 2004-0 5 IS AS UNDER:- MA NO.27/KOL/2013 (A/O ITA NO.48/KOL/2011) DCIT CIR-2, KOL V. M/S. MACMET INDIA LTD. PAGE 2 A.Y LOSS ASSESSED LOSS AS PER APPEAL EFFECT DIFFERENCE POTENTIAL TAX EFFECT 2004-05 (-)1,45,08,844/- (-)1,67,82,437/- 22,73,593 /- 6,82,078 THEREFORE, IT IS APPARENT THAT ITAT HAS DISMISSED T HE APPEALS IN LINE ON THE BASIS OF WRONG FIGURE OF TAX EFFECT WHICH IS BE LOW RS.3 LAKH. BUT ACTUALLY THE TAX EFFECT IS MORE THAN RS.3 LAKHS. WHEN BENCH RAISED A QUERY FROM THE TRIBUNALS ORDER IN ITA NO.48- 49/KOL/2011, WHEREIN THE TRIBUNAL HAS MENTIONED THE TAX EFFECT WHICH READS AS UNDER:- MACMET INDIA LIMITED A.YR. 2004-05 I.T. A PPEAL NO.48/KOL/2011 INCOME DECLARED INCOME ASSESSED DIFFERENTIAL TAX EF FECT (-) RS.1,49,52,413/- (-) RS.1,45,08,844/- RS.4,43,5 69/- RS.1,59,130/- MACME T INDIA LIMITED A.YR. 2004-05 I.T. A PPEAL NO.49/KOL/2011 INCOME DECLARED INCOME ASSESSED DIFFERENTIAL TAX EF FECT (-) RS.49,97,535/- (-) RS.48,96,608/- RS.1,00,927/- RS.36,932/- 3. ON QUERY FROM THE BENCH, WHETHER REV ENUE HAS CONTESTED THIS FACT AT THE TIME OF HEARING BEFORE TRIBUNAL. THE LD. SR- DR COULD NOT ANSWER. SINCE THE ISSUE WAS NOT CONTESTED BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL THA T THE TAX EFFECT IS MORE OR LESS AT THE TIME OF HEARING OF TH IS APPEAL AND PRESENTLY THE AR OF THE ASSESSEE CONTESTED THIS FACT, WE ARE OF T HE VIEW THAT THE MISTAKE CANNOT BE ATTRIBUTED IN THE ORDER OF TRIBUNAL AND T HERE IS NO MISTAKE IN THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL, WHICH IS APPARENT FROM THE R ECORD. WE DISMISS THIS MA OF THE REVENUE. 4. IN THE RESULT, MA OF REVENUE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT 17 /01/2013 SD/- SD/- (ABRAHAM P GORGE) ( MAHAVIR SINGH) (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) (JUDICIAL MEMBER) KOLKATA, *DKP #- 17/01/2014 MA NO.27/KOL/2013 (A/O ITA NO.48/KOL/2011) DCIT CIR-2, KOL V. M/S. MACMET INDIA LTD. PAGE 3 . . . . / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO:- 1. / APPELLANT 2. / RESPONDENT 3. 2 / CONCERNED CIT 4. 2- / CIT (A) 5. , , / DR, ITAT, KOLKATA 6. 9 / GUARD FILE. BY ORDER/ , /TRUE COPY/ / ,