Ghanshyam Das Verma, Kanpur V. Astt. Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Kanpur

MA 28/LKW/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 119 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 0923 (ITAT-LUCKNOW)
• Duration Of Justice: 5 month(s) 1 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Miscellaneous Application
• Pronouncement Date: 20-11-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: misc
• Appeal Filed On: 18-06-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: C K SINGH

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH A , LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI. T.S. KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JUDICIAL MEMBER M.A. NO.28/LKW/2018 [IN ITA NO. 27/LKW/2017] ASSESSMENT YEAR: BLOCK PERIOD ENDING ON 10/9/1989 GHANSHYAM DAS VERMA PROP. M/S JEWEL PALACE 59/40, BIRHANA ROAD KANPUR V. ACIT - 1 KANPUR T AN /PAN : ABHPV8567F (APP LIC A NT) (RESPONDENT) APP LIC ANT BY: SHRI RAKESH GARG, ADVOCATE RESPONDENT BY: SHRI C. K. SINGH, D.R. DATE OF HEARING: 16 11 201 8 DA TE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 20 11 201 8 O R D E R PER P ARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, J.M : THIS MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION PREFERRED BY THE ASSESSEE ARISES OUT OF THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED 8/8/2017 IN ITA NO. 27/LKW/2017 . 2. THE PETITION MOVED BY THE ASSESSEE IS REPRODUCED AS UNDER: - HON'BLE SIRS, MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOURS: WE ARE IN RECEIPT OF THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 27.07.2017 AS PASSED BY HON'BLE BENCH IN THE ABOVE MENTIONED CASE. A TYPOGRAPHICALLY ERROR HAS TAKEN PLACE IN THE APPELLATE ORDER, IN AS MUCH AS , THE BLOCK PERIOD ENDING 10.09.1989, WHEREAS IT SHOULD BE 'BLOCK PERIOD ENDING 10.09.1998'. M.A. NO.28/LKW/2018 PAGE 2 OF 2 ALSO IN THE 2ND LINE OF THE FIRST PARA OF THE ORDER ON PAGE 01 FOR BLOCK PERIOD ENDING 10.09.1989. IT SHOULD BE 10.09.1998. THE ABOVE BEING A TYPING MISTAKE, THE S AME MAY KINDLY BE RECTIFIED. A SUM OF RS.50/ - BEING COURT FEE HAS BEEN DEPOSITED. COPY OF THE CHALLAN IS ENCLOSED. SUB MITTED. 3. HOWEVER, D URING THE COURSE OF HEARING , LD. A.R. OF THE ASSESSEE MOVED AN APPLICATION DATED 1 6/11/ 2018 WITH A REQUEST TO ALLOW THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. SINCE THE ASSESSEE WANTS TO WITHDRAW THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION, TO WHICH THE REVENUE HAS NO OBJECTION, THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 3. IN THE RES ULT, MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 20 / 1 1 / 201 8 . SD/ - SD/ - [ T.S. KAPOOR ] [PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY ] ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 20 TH NOVEMBER , 201 8 JJ: 1611 COPY FORWARDED TO: 1 . APP LIC ANT 2 . RESPONDENT 3 . CIT(A) 4 . CIT 5 . DR BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR