IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH A , LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI S UNIL KUMAR YADAV , JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI. A. K. GARODIA , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER M.A. NOS.32 & 33/LKW/2012 [IN ITA NO. 140/LKW/2012 & C.O. NO.29/LKW/2012] ASSESSMENT YEAR S : 2002 - 0 3 & 2008 - 09 U.P. FOREST CORPORATION LTD. 21/475, INDIRA NAGAR LUCKNOW V. INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(4) LUCKNOW PAN: AAACU8180C (APP LIC ANT) (RESPONDENT) APP LIC ANT BY: SHRI. ASHISH RAJ SHUKLA, ADVOCATE RESPONDENT BY: SHRI. ALOK MITRA, D.R. DATE OF HEA RING: 30 0 5 2014 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 10 0 6 2014 O R D E R PER SUNIL KUMAR YADAV: THESE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS ARE PREFERRED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED 25.5.2012 IN ITA NO. 140/LKW/2012, ETC. & C.O. NO.29/LKW/2012 , E TC. 2 . DURING THE COURSE OF HEARING, THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT - ASSESSEE HAS MOVED AN APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS ON THE GROUND THAT THE MATTER INVOLVED IN THE M.A .S IS ALREADY CONCLUDED IN FAVOUR OF THE ASSESSEE BY THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT. THE REVENUE HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE PRAYER MADE ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS . ACCORDINGLY THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 3 . IN THE RESULT, BOTH THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS ARE DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 10.6.2014. SD/ - SD/ - [ A. K. GARODIA ] [ S UNIL KUMAR Y ADAV ] ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 10 TH JUNE , 2014 JJ: 0906 PRINT TO PDF WITHOUT THIS MESSAGE BY PURCHASING NOVAPDF ( HTTP://WWW.NOVAPDF.COM/ ) : - 2 - : COPY FORWARDED TO: 1 . APPELLANT 2 . RESPONDENT 3 . CIT(A) 4 . CIT 5 . DR AS SISTANT REGISTRAR PRINT TO PDF WITHOUT THIS MESSAGE BY PURCHASING NOVAPDF ( HTTP://WWW.NOVAPDF.COM/ )