आयकर अपीलȣय अͬधकरण, इंदौर Ûयायपीठ, इंदौर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INDORE BENCH, INDORE BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI B.M. BIYANI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MA No.33/Ind/2023 (Arising out of I.T.A.No. ITA No.293/Ind/2017) Assessment Year: 2010-11 ACIT, 4(1), Indore. बनाम/ Vs. Shri Raj Kumar Patel, 12/8, New Palasia, Indore. (Revenue /Applicant) (Assessee / Respondent) PAN: ACCPP7174Q Assessee by Shri A.K.Khandelwal, AR Revenue by Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 06.10.2023 Date of Pronouncement 06.10.023 आदेश / O R D E R Per B.M. Biyani, A.M.: This Misc. Application [‘”M/A”] u/s 254(2) of Income-tax Act, 1961 is filed by Revenue seeking recall of Order dated 24.09.2018 of ITAT, Indore Bench in ITA No. 293/Indore/2017 for assessment-year 2010-11 [“impugned order”]. 2. Ld. AR for assessee instantly submits and Ld. DR for revenue agrees that this is the 2 nd M/A filed by Revenue relatable to the same ITA No. ACIT,4(1),Indore. Vs. Shri Rajkumar Patel, Indore. MANo.33/Ind2023 – AY 2010-11 Page 2 of 2 293/Indore/2017 after dismissal of 1 st M/A No. 59/Indore/2019 vide order dated 30.11.2022. It further emerged that the 1 st M/A itself was dismissed on the ground of being time-barred having been filed by revenue after expiry of time-limit prescribed in section 254(2), then how this 2 nd M/A be within time and entertained? Ld. Representatives of both sides clearly agree that the present M/A is also time-barred and liable to be dismissed. In view of such consensus by parties, this M/A is dismissed. 3. Resultantly, this M/A is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on conclusion of hearing and subsequently reduced in writing on the same day Sd/- sd/- (VIJAY PAL RAO) (B.M. BIYANI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Indore Ǒदनांक /Dated : 06.10.2023 CPU/Sr. PS Copies to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) Departmental Representative (6) Guard File By order UE COPY Sr. Private Secretary Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Indore Bench, Indore