IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER M.P. NOS. 31 TO 34/BANG/2018 (IN WTA NOS. 1 TO 4/BANG/2017 ) ASSESSMENT YEAR S : 20 03 - 04 TO 2006 - 07 SMT. SNEHALATA M KUNNUR, BEHIND HOTEL EVERSHINE, VIVEKANAND NAGAR, SHIGGAON, HAVERI. PAN: BHWPS3851F VS. THE WEALTH TAX OFFICER, WARD 3 (1), HUBLI. APPELLANT RESPONDENT APPELLANT BY : SHRI SIDDHARTH, ADVOCATE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI M. NARASIMHA RAJU, JCIT (DR) DATE OF HEARING : 27 .0 4 .2018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 02 . 0 5 .201 8 O R D E R PER SHRI SUNIL KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER THESE FOUR MISCELLANEOUS PETITIONS ARE PREFERRED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR RECALLING OF THE TRIBUNAL ORDER DATED 15.12.2017. 2. DURING THE COURSE OF HEARING, THE LD. COUNSEL FO R THE ASSESSEE INVITED OUR ATTENTION THAT THE ABSENCE OF THE ASSESSEE ON THE D ATE OF HEARING WAS NOT INTENTIONAL AS THE COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE HAS ENT ERED THE WRONG DATE OF HEARING IN THE DIARY. THEREFORE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE , THE EX-PARTE ORDER DATED 15.12.2017 MAY BE RECALLED AND APPEAL WILL BE REPOS TED FOR FRESH HEARING. FINDING FORCE IN THE CONTENTION OF THE ASSESSEE, WE RECALL OUR ORDER DATED 15.12.2017 AND DIRECT THE REGISTRY TO FIX THIS APPE AL FOR HEARING IN DUE COURSE. M.P. NOS. 31 TO 34/BANG/2018 (IN WTA NOS. 1 TO 4/BANG/2017) PAGE 2 OF 2 3. IN THE RESULT, ALL THE FOUR MISCELLANEOUS PETITI ONS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE ARE ALLOWED. SD/- SD/- (INTURI RAMA RAO) (SUNIL KUMAR YADAV) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER BANGALORE, DATED, THE 02 ND MAY, 2018. /MS/ COPY TO: 1. APPELLANT 4. CIT(A) 2. RESPONDENT 5. DR, ITAT, BANGALORE 3. CIT 6. GUARD FILE BY ORDER SENIOR PRIVATE SECRETARY, INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE.