Sri Mavva Nagi reddy, Sattenapalli V. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), , Guntur

MA 35/VIZ/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 119 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 2073 (ITAT-VISAKHAPATNAM)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 month(s) 26 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Miscellaneous Application
• Pronouncement Date: 16-11-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Assessment Year: 2008-2009
• Appeal Filed On: 21-08-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SUMAN MALIK
• Assessee Lawyers: C SUBRAHMANYAM F

Judgement Text

M.A. NO. 35/VIZ/2018 ( MOVVA NAGI REDDY ) 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER M.A.NO. 35/VIZ/2018 ( ARISING OUT OF I . T .A.NO. 212 /VIZ / 2017 ) ( ASSESSMENT YEAR : 200 8 - 0 9 ) MUVV A NAGI REDDY, PROP. BALAJI MEDICINAL AND AROMATIC PRODUCTS, GOLLAMUDIVARI STREET, SATTENAPALLI (PO & M ANDAL ), GUNTUR DISTRICT. VS. ITO, WARD - 1(1), GUNTUR. [ PAN: AKOPM 1107 A ] ( APPELLANT) ( RESPONDENT ) ASSESSEE BY : SHRI C. SUBRAHMANYAM - F CA DEPARTMENT BY : SMT. SUMA N MALIK SR. DR DATE OF HEARING : 09 / 1 1/201 8 DATE OF P RONOUNCEMENT : 16 / 1 1 /201 8 O R D E R PER V. DURGA RAO , JUDIC IAL MEMBER : BY THIS MISC. APPLICATION, ASSESSEE SEEKS RECALL OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS TRIBUNAL IN ITA NO. 212 /VIZ/2012, DATED 18 / 0 7 /201 8 . 2. LD . AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ASSESSEE HAS REITERATED THE SUBMISSIONS WHICH HE MADE DURING THE COURSE O F HEARING OF THE APPEAL. 3. ON THE OTHER HAND, LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE STRONGLY OPPOSED FOR RECALLING OF THE ORDER. M.A. NO. 35/VIZ/2018 ( MOVVA NAGI REDDY ) 2 4. WE HAVE HEARD BOTH THE PARTIES AND PERUSED THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS TRIBUNAL DATED 18/07/2018 . WE FIND THAT THE AUTHORISED REPRE SENTATIVE FOR THE ASSESSEE IS NOT ABLE TO POINT OUT ANY MISTAKE IN THE ORDER, EXCEPT REITERATING THE SUBMISSIONS WHICH HE MADE AT THE TIME OF HEARING OF THE APPEAL. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, WE FIND NO MERIT IN THE MISC. APPLICATION FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AND IS DESERVES TO BE DISMISSED. ACCORDINGLY, DISMISS THE SAME . 5. IN THE RESULT, THE MISC. APPLICATION FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. O RDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 16 TH NOVEMBER , 201 8 SD/ - SD/ - ( D.S. SUNDER SINGH) (V. DURGA RAO) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED 16 / 1 1/201 8 VR /SPS COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : - 1. THE APPELLANT MUVVA NAGI REDDY, PROP. BALAJI MEDICINAL AND AROMATIC PRODUCTS, G OLLAMUDIVARI STREET, SATTENAPALLI (PO & MANDAL), GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE RESPONDENT IT O , WARD - 1 (1), GUNTUR. 3. THE PR. CIT, GUNTUR. 4. THE CIT(A) - 1 , GUNTUR . 5 . DR, ITAT, VISAKHAPATNAM 6 . GUARD FILE BY ORDER // TRUE COPY // SR.PRIVATE SECRETARY ITAT, VISAKHAPATNAM